A study of a military law of the U.K. after World War II -focussing on changes in reform of court-martial -

二战后英国军事法研究——重点关注军事法庭改革的变化——

• 批准号: 13620035
• 负责人: OTA Hajime
• 金额: $ 1.98万
• 依托单位: Tsuyama National College of Technology
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 2001
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2001 至 2003
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-13620035/
• 关键词: the U.K.; Armed Forces; Court-martial; Military law; Europen court of human rights; ヨーロッパ人権裁判所

The subject of this research is to study a conflict and compromise between "civil law" and "military law" focussing on the reform of court-martial in the U.K. The term of this project was a very good opportunity, because following on a judgement of European Court of Human Rights, the reform of court-martial started with armed forces act 1996, the reform by armed forces discipline act 2000 which connected with summary justice followed and now the other reforms continue.The concrete results are collecting the judgements by which court-martial will be able to be looked as an independent and impartial tribunal. These include avoiding any involvement by the chain of command in judicial proceedings, an adoption of judicial officers, keeping independence and impartiality of members of court-martial and so on forth.There are some other subjects which are worth researching for studying the legal position of the armed forces in the constitutional system of the U.K. I would like to continue my research of these subjects.

本研究的主题是研究围绕英国军事法庭改革的“民法”与“军事法”之间的冲突与妥协。这一项目的任期是一个很好的机会，因为在欧洲人权法院的判决之后，军事法庭的改革始于1996年的《武装力量法》，紧随其后的是与简易司法相关的2000年《武装力量纪律法》改革，现在其他改革仍在继续。具体结果是收集判决，使军事法庭能够被视为独立和公正的法庭。这些包括避免指挥系统介入司法程序、采用司法人员、保持军事法庭成员的独立性和公正性等。对于研究武装部队在英国宪法制度中的法律地位，还有其他一些值得研究的课题。我想继续对这些课题进行研究。

项目成果

Hajime, OTa: "A reform of court-martial and summary justice of the U.K. 「Privataization and the importance of public service」(edited by Akira Hrano, Kiyoshi Hamakawa, Kazuho Haruyama)"Horitu bunnkasha. (2003)

Hajime, OTa：“英国军事法庭和简易司法的改革‘私有化和公共服务的重要性’（由 Akira Hrano、Kiyoshi Hamakawa、Kazuho Haruyama 编辑）”Horitu Bunnkasha (2003)。

大田 肇: "モリス対UK事件の概要"津山工業高等専門学校紀要. 45号. 107-114 (2004)

Hajime Ota：“莫里斯诉英国案摘要”津山国立技术学院公告第 45 号。107-114（2004 年）。

大田 肇: "民営化と公共性の確保(拙稿「イギリスにおける軍法会議略式命令の改革」)"法律文化社、原野翹, 浜川清, 晴山一穂編. 304(285-304) (2003)

Hajime Ota：“私有化和确保公共性（我的论文‘英国军事法院简易命令的改革’）”Horitsu Bunkasha，Akira Harano、Kiyoshi Hamakawa 和 Kazuho Haruyama 编辑 304(285-304) (2003)。

Hajime, OTa: "An outline of "Morris v United Kingdom""Bulletin or Tsuyama national college of technology. No.45. 107-114 (2004)

Hajime，OTa：““莫里斯诉英国”的概要”公告或津山国立技术大学。

大田 肇: "『民営化と公共性の確保』"原野翹・浜川清・晴山一穂編 法律文化社. (2002)

Hajime Ota：“‘私有化和确保公共性’”由 Akira Harano、Kiyoshi Hamakawa 和 Kazuho Haruyama 编辑，Horitsu Bunkasha (2002)。