权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Study on a Change of Westphalian Paradigm in International Law

国际法中威斯特伐利亚范式的变迁研究

基本信息

批准号：
13620037
负责人：
OKUWAKI Naoya
金额：
$ 1.98万
依托单位：
The University of Tokyo
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2001
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2001 至 2003
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

In this project, I have studied the change of Westphalian conception of international society, with special reference to the evolving norms and their functions of contemporary international law rules and institutions. Those themes are taken up First, the concept of territorial sovereignty, historic mode of acquisition of territory in the age of colonialism, the conflicting elements of effective control and legitimacy of government based on territory, referring to logics contained in the decisions of ICJ and other international tribunals. Second, the trends for change of the Westphalian paradigm in an age of globalization, as are reflected in the contents of rules and function of international law and institutions, especially in the fields of human rights norms, protection of rights of private individuals, regime of refugees and other displaced persons, indigenous people, regime of extradition of the criminals, etc. Third, the role of private individuals in the lawmaking and implementation of the contemporary international law, which necessitates the change of state-centric view derived from Westpahlian paradigm. Forth, the strategy of the so-called positivistic school of international law, and the logic in the decisions international courts, in dealing with such a fundamental change in the rules and functions of international law, focusing on the logics in controlling time-factors and those contained in the provisional measures indicated by ICJ.

在这个项目中，我研究了威斯特伐利亚国际社会概念的变化，特别是当代国际法规则和机构的演变规范及其功能。第一，领土主权的概念、殖民主义时代获取领土的历史模式、有效控制与基于领土的政府合法性之间的冲突因素，并提到国际法院和其他国际法庭的裁决中所载的逻辑。第二，全球化时代威斯特伐利亚范式的变化趋势，这反映在国际法和国际机构的规则和职能的内容上，特别是在人权准则、保护个人权利、难民和其他流离失所者制度、土著人民、罪犯引渡制度等领域。私人在当代国际法立法和实施中的作用，这需要改变威斯特帕利亚范式中的国家中心观。第四，国际法实证学派的策略，以及国际法院在处理国际法规则和功能的这种根本变化时的判决逻辑，重点是控制时间因素的逻辑和国际法院指示的临时措施中所包含的逻辑。