权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Social-ethical Study of "the Public"

“公众”的社会伦理研究

基本信息

批准号：
14510042
负责人：
ABIKO K
金额：
$ 0.9万
依托单位：
Shiga University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2002
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2002 至 2004
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

In this research I orientated myself to the human relations in society, and, as their good way that should be, put "the public" into study. In the first place, I, from a meta-ethical standpoint, set up its levels-economic, ethical and political ones, and clarified their specific features respectively, especially regarding their mutual differences. Second, I made it clear that the image of "the public" differed in these levels according to which is preferred to between liberalism and communitarianism as fundamental types of humanity ; specifically pointing out that the former has an affinity for the economic and ethical levels, and the latter for the political. Third, in connection with arguments of Rawls, I made the nature of republicanism clear especially in terms of its difference from communitarianism. Fourth, on the ethical and political levels, I made clear a distinction which lies between an action in the public relation or space and that of "public" there, and then, as a consideration, critically examined the way in which such an action itself is "private." This presupposes an elucidation of what it is to "be ethical" (in a broad sense). In order to clarify this sufficiently, the concept "ethical" itself needs inquiring, which will be the next main subject.As applications of my research, for my fifth inquiry. I considered the environmental and landscape problems, so to speak, as "public ones", and examined how to address them. Finally, I critically analyzed "civic education"-the education of citizens as beings supporting "the public"-, namely its present condition in Japan.

在本研究中，我将自己定位于社会中的人际关系，并将“公众”纳入研究，作为其应有的良好方式。首先，本文从元伦理的角度出发，建立了经济伦理、伦理伦理和政治伦理的层次，阐明了它们各自的特点，特别是它们之间的差异。第二，我明确指出，“公众”的形象在这些层面上是不同的，根据这一点，自由主义和社群主义更倾向于作为人类的基本类型;特别指出，前者对经济和伦理层面有亲和力，后者对政治层面有亲和力。第三，结合罗尔斯的论证，我明确了共和主义的本质，特别是它与社群主义的区别。第四，在伦理和政治的层面上，我明确区分了公共关系或空间中的行动与那里的“公共”行动，然后，作为一种考虑，批判性地考察了这种行动本身是如何“私人”的。这就需要阐明什么是“道德的”（广义上的）。为了充分澄清这一点，“伦理”这个概念本身需要探究，这将是下一个主要课题。我认为环境和景观问题，可以说，是“公共问题”，并研究如何解决这些问题。最后，我批判性地分析了“公民教育”--作为支持“公众”的人的公民教育--即日本的现状。