Analysis of methods expressing vulnerability to disasters

表达灾害易损性的方法有三种。一只眼睛失明使用概率理论表达式，例如地震发生的概率。第二个标准是用科学的方法确定危险的大小。例如，它是天气警告等。第三个是基于工程视图指定的损坏大小的标准。例如，建筑物的倒塌危险等。然而，收到信息的公民很难理解这些表达方式中危险的紧迫性。此外，它还受到一个限制，即它不能判断应具体进行哪种函件。这项研究对公民来说是易懂的，并考察了危险的表现方式，这可以决定公民如何判断和应该进一步采取行动。过去灾害发生的时间，如2004年新泻暴雨灾害、丰冈洪灾损失、2004年新泻中期地震d…更多的灾难，JR福山线列车脱轨事故，以及飓风卡特琳娜，都被做成了例子。对灾害发生时对应的追赶者和受灾者进行了灾害民族志调查。明确了影响其危险性认知和灾害应对行为的因素，分析了影响判断和决策的信息。此外，还分析了导致灾害对应行动变化的信息。此外，还整理了灾难发生时的调查数据，并创建了灾难ESUNGU Rafi。研讨会就是在此基础上举办的。因此，为了让民间社会接受危险信息并联系到适当的防灾行动，只有通过提供危险信息才是有限度的。此外，灾难民族志带来的一种对灾难的替代体验变得清晰起来，他们可以详细阅读过去的灾难情况等，同时理解一个灾难的过程。较少

There are three methods expressing vulnerability to disaster. Blindness in one eye uses probability theory expressions, such as occurrence probability of an earthquake. The 2nd is a standard specified with the size of the hazard seen scientifically. For example, it is a weather warning etc. The 3rd is a standard specified with the size of damage based on an engineering view. For example, it is the collapse danger of a building etc. However, it is difficult for the citizen who received the information to understand the urgency nature of danger in these modes of expression. Furthermore, there was a limit that it could not judge what kind of correspondence should be carried out concretely. This research was intelligible for the citizen and examined the mode of expression of the danger which can decide how citizens judge and should act further. The time of the disaster generated in the past, such as the 2004 Niigata heavy rain disaster, Toyooka flood damage, a 2004 Mid-Niigata Earthquake d … More isaster, JR Fukuchiyama Line train derailment accident, and hurricane Katorina, was made into the example. Disaster ethnography investigation to the pursuer and disaster victim corresponding to disaster when such disaster occurs was conducted. The factor which specifies the cognition of their danger and the action corresponding to disaster was clarified, and the information which brought influence to judgment and decision-making was analyzed. Moreover, the information which resulted in change to the action corresponding to disaster was analyzed. Furthermore, the data of the investigation at the time of disaster was arranged, and disaster ESUNOGU Rafi was created. The workshop was held based on it. As a result, in order for civil society to accept danger information and to connect to suitable disaster prevention action, it turned out only by presentation of danger information that there is a limit. Moreover, a feeling of a vicarious experience of the disaster brought about by disaster ethnography who can read the past disaster situation etc. in detail and understanding of a disaster process simultaneously became clear. Less