Researches on Roles of Historical Schools in Japan, Germany And Britain, And on Their Modern Meaning.

日德英历史学派的作用及其现代意义研究。

• 批准号: 17330043
• 负责人: OKABE Hiromi
• 金额: $ 6.22万
• 依托单位: Hokkaido University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
• 财政年份: 2005
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2005 至 2007
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-17330043/
• 关键词: Historical School; Older Historical School; Younger Historical School; English Historical School; Japanese Historical School; Evolutionary Economics; Methodology of Economics; 進化論; ドイツ歴史学派; 日本経済学; 資本主義論; 知識理論; 新カント派; 日本の経済学; オーストリア学派; 理論と歴史

This project aimed to understand Historical Schools, which rose in some countries at the turn from the 19th century to the 20th, as the new tides in economic science. We carried it on with four perspectives: (1) German Historical School as the synthesis of various standpoints, (2) English Historical School playing critical rolls at the forming period of neo-classical school, (3) Japanese Historical School pursuing originality after the institutionalization of economic studies, (4) Historical School, Austrian, Marshall and contemporaries evaluated as methodological forerunners for modern Evolutionary Economics.(1) German economists, called generically Historical School, has to be understood with diversity and vitality about scientific locations between theoretical and historical-empirical approaches, and about different standpoints for Social Science, capitalism and socialism including intergenerational differences. (2) J.S. Mill, the representative of classical school, was criticized by Historical School because of his Ricardian position, though he admitted the historical approach. On the other hand, his social reformism was received a high evaluation from Historical School. (3) The academic blank at the late Taisho period made by the collapse of Japan Society of Social Policy brought a new tide to inquire the historical distinctiveness of Japanese economic society, which had not been analyzed enough consciously by Japanese academe. (4) The low evaluation to Methodological Controversy held at the end of the 19th century is missing that persons concerned referred to developing knowledge science, statistics and biology (theory of evolution). Their views include many main points under the discussion of modern Evolutionary Economics.We will make the best use of these results in our research and education exceeding the range of comparative study of Historical Schools to contribute to the advancement of economic science.

这个项目旨在了解历史学派，它在19世纪到20世纪之交在一些国家兴起，作为经济科学的新浪潮。我们从四个角度进行了研究：(1)德国历史学派作为各种观点的综合；(2)英国历史学派在新古典学派形成时期起着关键作用；(3)日本历史学派在经济研究制度化后追求独创性；(4)历史学派、奥地利历史学派、马歇尔及其同时代人被评价为现代进化经济学方法论的先驱。(1)一般被称为历史学派的德国经济学家，必须以多样性和活力来理解理论和历史经验方法之间的科学位置，以及社会科学、资本主义和社会主义的不同立场，包括代际差异。(2)古典学派的代表人物J.S.密尔虽然承认历史的方法，但由于他的李嘉图立场而受到历史学派的批评。另一方面，他的社会改良主义受到历史学派的高度评价。(3)大正后期日本社会政策学会的崩溃所造成的学术空白，为日本经济社会历史特殊性的探究带来了新的潮流，而日本学术界对这一问题的自觉分析还不够。(4) 19世纪末对方法论之争的低评价缺失了相关人士对发展知识科学、统计学和生物学（进化论）的关注。他们的观点包含了现代演化经济学讨论的许多要点。我们会在历史学派比较研究以外的研究和教育中，充分利用这些成果，为经济科学的发展作出贡献。

项目成果

W.カニンガムにおける理論と歴史

W·坎宁安的理论与历史

• 发表时间: 2006
• 期刊: 経済学研究(北海道大学) 55-4
• 作者: AIBA;Keiko;白石 さや;白石 さや;竹中 千春;竹中 千春;白石 さや;白石 さや;白石 さや;吉村 真子;吉村 真子;合場 敬子;合場 敬子;中田 瑞穂;吉村 真子;竹中 千春;合場 敬子;合場 敬子;合場 敬子;浪岡 新太郎;浪岡 新太郎;浪岡 新太郎;竹中 千春;竹中 千春;竹中 千春;竹中 千春;白石 さや(共著);白石 さや;白石 さや(共著);浪岡 慎太郎(共著);吉村 真子(共著);中田 瑞穂(共著);浪岡 新太郎(共著);竹中千春(共著);原伸子編(吉村真子);佐々木憲介
• 通讯作者: 佐々木憲介