A study of the oneself and others recognition of the East Asia in 18-19 centuries

从某种程度上讲，近代以来的历史文本倾向于关注自己的国家。这些描绘了这个国家的特色和文化认同。同样重要的是要考虑以下几点：这不是前现代时代的现象；这是现代历史记载特有的一种记录方法；它不仅存在于日本。在德国和法国，每个国家都有不同的历史学家描绘历史的方法。尽管如此，欧洲还是创造了一种风格，将历史描绘成一系列独特的东西，为自己的国家制定范式。因此，我们需要达成一种理解，即我们自现代以来如何习惯于用自己国家鲜明特点的历史来粉饰历史文本，这是不言而喻的。因此，为了考虑研究的基本原则，我觉得我们必须以“同时”和“同步”的观点为起点。也就是说，由于一部国家历史只讨论该国的特点，因此，重要的是要以相反的目标为目标，以实现一个包含不同国家之间的共同点的观点。要做到这一点，重要的是至少开始讨论我们可以通过跨越国界达成什么原则或原则。我们必须认识到尊重相互民族、尊重人权、尊重和平的重要性。历史。

Somehow or another historical texts since the modern period tend to focus on one's country. These depict the country's features and cultural identity. It's also important to consider the following: this isn't a phenomenon of the pre-modern era; it's a method of documentation characteristic of modern historical accounts; and it's a feature not just found in Japan. In Germany and France, each country has distinct and different methods by which historians portray history. Still, Europe created the style of depicting history as a set of peculiarities that formulate the paradigm for one's own country. We thus need to reach an understanding that it is self-evident in how we have been accustomed since modern times to historical texts that have been whitewashed with history of distinct characteristics of one's own country. Therefore, in order to consider the fundamentals of the study, I feel that we have to set a starting point that places importance on viewpoints of "simultaneity" and "synchronicity". That is, since a national history only discusses features characteristic of that country, it would be important to aim for the opposite in achieving a perspective that incorporates commonalities among different countries. To do so, it is important to start discussing at least what tenets or principles we can arrive at by crossing over national boundaries. We must recognize the importance of respecting mutual nationalities, human rights, and peace. histories.