Criminal Trial and Evidence Law under the Japanese New Popular Participation System (Saiban-in System)

日本新民众参与制度（裁判院制度）下的刑事审判与证据法

• 批准号: 17530053
• 负责人: OSAWA Yutaka
• 金额: $ 1.48万
• 依托单位: The University of Tokyo (2007)Nagoya University (2005-2006)
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 2005
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2005 至 2007
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-17530053/
• 关键词: saiban-in; evidence law; criminal trial; hearsay rule; confession; admissibility of evidence; 同意書面; 検察官面前調書; 合意書面

Under the new Japanese popular participation system in criminal trial (saiban-in system), it is necessary to make the trial speedy and conducted in such a manner as the saiban-in understand the case and proceeding easily. To achieve this goal, it is necessary to sort out the true contested issues and to select the indispensable evidence, which are presented to the trial, strictly. That causes the reexamination of the the current practice of criminal trial and evidence in many points. This research project focused on the several topics regarding (1) the system to sort out the contested issues and select the indispensable evidence and (2) the rule on the admissibility of evidence, and considered the problems, found out in the reexamination of the disputes heretofore, which should be resolved for the smooth administration of the saiban-in system.Regarding(1), the count(soin) system in the indictment and the koso appeal system are focused and it is considered how the system to sort out the contested issues and the best evidence combined with the restriction of producing evidence thereafter reflects upon the public prosecutor's authority to change the count during the trial proceeding and upon the appeal court's power to examine evidence not produced to the first instance court.Regarding (2), mainly the admissibility of documentary evidence is considered, focusing on the hearsay exceptions provided in the Art. 326 and 327 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP) and ones provided in the Art. 321 Sec. 1 Nr.2 of the CCP. The legal standard for the admissibility of confession, scientific evidence and illegally obtained evidence is also reexamined.

Under the new Japanese popular participation system in criminal trial (saiban-in system), it is necessary to make the trial speedy and conducted in such a manner as the saiban-in understand the case and proceeding easily. To achieve this goal, it is necessary to sort out the true contested issues and to select the indispensable evidence, which are presented to the trial, strictly. That causes the reexamination of the the current practice of criminal trial and evidence in many points. This research project focused on the several topics regarding (1) the system to sort out the contested issues and select the indispensable evidence and (2) the rule on the admissibility of evidence, and considered the problems, found out in the reexamination of the disputes heretofore, which should be resolved for the smooth administration of the saiban-in system.Regarding(1), the count(soin) system in the indictment and the koso appeal system are focused and it is considered how the system to sort out the contested issues and the best evidence combined with the restriction of producing evidence thereafter reflects upon the public prosecutor's authority to change the count during the trial proceeding and upon the appeal court's power to examine evidence not produced to the first instance court.Regarding (2), mainly the admissibility of documentary evidence is considered, focusing on the hearsay exceptions provided in the Art. 326 and 327 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP) and ones provided in the Art. 321 Sec. 1 Nr.2 of the CCP. The legal standard for the admissibility of confession, scientific evidence and illegally obtained evidence is also reexamined.

项目成果

〔対談〕共同正犯の訴因と訴因変更の要否

【访谈】同案犯的案由及是否需要变更案由

• 发表时间: 2007
• 期刊: 法学教室 324
• 作者: Ishikawa;Masaoki.;石川 正興;Kensuke ITOH;Kensuke ITOH;伊東 研祐(他編著);伊東 研祐(他編著);伊東 研祐(他編著);伊東 研祐(他編著);山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口 直也;山口直也;山口 直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;刑事立法研究会編(山口直也共著);前田忠弘他編(山口直也共著);刑事立法研究会;刑事立法研究会;山口直也・上田信太郎共著;山口直也;斉藤豊治・守屋克彦編(山口直也共著);斉藤豊治・守屋克彦編(山口直也共著);福岡弁護士会子どもの権利委員会(山口直也共著);山口直也;守山正・後藤弘子編(山口直也共著);山口直也;堀部政男・新倉修他編(山口直也共著);大澤裕=杉田宗久;大澤裕;Y. Osawa & M. Sugita;Y. Osawa;大澤裕=植村立郎
• 通讯作者: 大澤裕=植村立郎

Count Charging Co-Principals and Change of the count

计数收费主要原则及计数变化

• 发表时间: 2007
• 期刊: Hogaku Kyoshitsu vol. 324
• 作者: Ishikawa;Masaoki.;石川 正興;Kensuke ITOH;Kensuke ITOH;伊東 研祐(他編著);伊東 研祐(他編著);伊東 研祐(他編著);伊東 研祐(他編著);山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口 直也;山口直也;山口 直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;刑事立法研究会編(山口直也共著);前田忠弘他編(山口直也共著);刑事立法研究会;刑事立法研究会;山口直也・上田信太郎共著;山口直也;斉藤豊治・守屋克彦編(山口直也共著);斉藤豊治・守屋克彦編(山口直也共著);福岡弁護士会子どもの権利委員会(山口直也共著);山口直也;守山正・後藤弘子編(山口直也共著);山口直也;堀部政男・新倉修他編(山口直也共著);大澤裕=杉田宗久;大澤裕;Y. Osawa & M. Sugita;Y. Osawa;大澤裕=植村立郎;Y. Osawa & R. Uemura
• 通讯作者: Y. Osawa & R. Uemura

シンポジウム・裁判員制度の展望と課題-公判審理のあり方をめぐって-

研讨会：非专业法官制度的前景与问题 - 关于审判听证会的理想形式 -

• 发表时间: 2005
• 期刊: 愛知大学法学部法経論集 168
• 作者: T. Shubashi;et. al.;大澤裕;Y. Osawa;大澤 裕;伊藤納
• 通讯作者: 伊藤納

Specificity of the Count Charging the Offense against the Art. 5 of the "Mayaku-Tokurei-Hou"

指控艺术罪的伯爵的特殊性。

• 发表时间: 2008
• 期刊: Jurist vol. 1358
• 作者: Ishikawa;Masaoki.;石川 正興;Kensuke ITOH;Kensuke ITOH;伊東 研祐(他編著);伊東 研祐(他編著);伊東 研祐(他編著);伊東 研祐(他編著);山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口 直也;山口直也;山口 直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;山口直也;刑事立法研究会編(山口直也共著);前田忠弘他編(山口直也共著);刑事立法研究会;刑事立法研究会;山口直也・上田信太郎共著;山口直也;斉藤豊治・守屋克彦編(山口直也共著);斉藤豊治・守屋克彦編(山口直也共著);福岡弁護士会子どもの権利委員会(山口直也共著);山口直也;守山正・後藤弘子編(山口直也共著);山口直也;堀部政男・新倉修他編(山口直也共著);大澤裕=杉田宗久;大澤裕;Y. Osawa & M. Sugita;Y. Osawa
• 通讯作者: Y. Osawa

自白の証拠能力といわゆる違法排除説

口供的证据价值与所谓非法排除说

• 发表时间: 2006
• 期刊: 研修 694
• 作者: T. Shubashi;et. al.;大澤裕;Y. Osawa;大澤 裕
• 通讯作者: 大澤 裕