权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A Comparative Study in Political Philosophy of Leo Strauss, Oakeshott and Jouvenel

列奥·施特劳斯、奥克肖特、茹弗内尔政治哲学比较研究

基本信息

批准号：
17530114
负责人：
NAKAGANE Satoshi
金额：
$ 0.76万
依托单位：
Kokushikan University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2005
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2005 至 2007
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-17530114/
关键词：
Leo Strauss Oakeshott Jouvenel Political Philosophy Hobbes Conservatism ホツブズ

项目摘要

This research compares the political philosophies of Leo Strauss, Oakeshott and Jouvenel These three political philosophers have been studied respectively, but their mutual relationship or the philosophical context they share could not be said to have received good attention it deserves. By making clear their coreferential relationship, this research tries to lay out their common concern as political philosopher, that is: 1.What is political philosophy?, 2.Hobbes, and 3.Conservatism.1.Strauss, Oakeshott and Jouvenel all conceive political philosophy in terms of the natural tension between politics and philosophy, and in this respect they differ radically from the dominant political theorists, who premise a harmonious relation between political activity and theory (M.Lilla's Reckless Mind and "The Political Philosophy of Bertrand de Jouvenel").2.They all take Hobbes' Leviathan as an epoch-making work in the history of political philosophy. Strauss' and Oakeshott's interpretations of Hobbes were the results of their long philosophical conversation ("Between Subject and Subject" and Oakeshott's Hobbes on Civil Association) .3.Their political doctrines could be all categorized as conservatism. But while Strauss' and Jouvenel's conservatism are derived from the traditional conservative ideas such as nature or pluralism, Oakeshott's should be regarded as very idiosyncratic in that it was based on the contingency of history, community and human conduct ("Conservatism" and "Contingency and Politics in Oakeshott").

本研究比较了列奥·施特劳斯、奥克肖特和茹弗内尔的政治哲学。这三位政治哲学家虽然分别被研究过，但他们之间的相互关系或他们所共有的哲学语境却没有得到应有的重视。通过厘清他们的共指关系，本文试图展示他们作为政治哲学家的共同关注点，即：1.政治哲学是什么？2.霍布斯，3.保守主义。1.施特劳斯、奥克肖特和茹弗内尔都是从政治与哲学之间的自然张力来构思政治哲学的，在这方面他们与占统治地位的政治理论家有着根本的不同，他们以政治活动和理论之间的和谐关系为前提（《利拉先生的鲁莽心灵》和《茹弗内尔的政治哲学》）2.他们都把霍布斯的《利维坦》看作是政治哲学史上的一部划时代的著作。施特劳斯和奥克肖特对霍布斯的解读是他们长期哲学对话的结果（《主体与主体之间》和奥克肖特的《霍布斯论公民结社》）。但是，施特劳斯和茹弗内尔的保守主义都是从传统的保守主义思想如自然或多元主义中衍生出来的，而奥克肖特的保守主义则是建立在历史、社会和人类行为的偶然性基础上的，因而具有很强的特殊性（“保守主义”和“奥克肖特的偶然性与政治”）。