权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Significance and Limit of the Progressive View of History and Possibility of an Alternative View: Reviewing the Controversy between the Ancients and the Moderns

进步历史观的意义、局限性及另一种历史观的可能性：回顾古今之争

基本信息

批准号：
18320007
负责人：
KURIHARA Takashi
金额：
$ 10.98万
依托单位：
Niigata University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
2006
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2006 至 2007
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

1. As results of our collaborative study, we have found that the European contrast between the Ancient and the Modern was similar to that between the South and the North, or between totality and subjectivity, and that the characters of Modern Pictures can be discovered already in the Flemmish School in the 15th century, before Descartes. These themes were discussed in the articles by .KURIHARA, ISAKA and OTABE in Study of Hegelian Philosophy, vol. 12 and 13.2. The progressive view of history was not an thought that simply honored the modern progress, but that was motivated by the hopes of overcoming the modern. Another expression of such hopes was the romanticism. These were themes of OTABE, KURIHARA and ISAKA in Studies on the German Romantic School (edited by ISAKA).3. In the Hegelian thesis of the End of Art, a contrast between the Ancient and the Modern means that between art and philosophy. Hegel argued that in the modern atomic society, in which art was just an hobby, philosophy should get back the self-cognition of spirit and overcome the modern. These themes were discussed by KURIHARA (Article "When art becomes interesting"), YAMAUCHI, SATO, KATO, OTABE, MORIMOTO, KIDO, ISAKA and ZAKOTA in When art begins, and when art ends (edited by KURIHARA).4. According to our research (KURIHARA, ISAKA, KATO), transcendental idealism was projected as another view of history as "development of self-consciousness", against the progressive view of history as quantitative accumulation.

1.作为我们合作研究的结果，我们发现，欧洲古代与现代之间的对比类似于南方与北方之间的对比，或者整体性与主观性之间的对比，并且现代绘画的特征已经可以在笛卡尔之前的15世纪的佛莱米什学派中发现。这些主题在栗原、坂和大田部在《黑格尔哲学研究》第12卷和第13.2卷中的文章中讨论过。进步史观不是一种简单地推崇现代进步的思想，而是以克服现代的希望为动力的。这种希望的另一种表现是浪漫主义。这些都是大田部、栗原、坂本在《德国浪漫主义学派研究》（坂本主编）中的主题。在黑格尔的艺术终结论中，古代与现代的对比意味着艺术与哲学的对比。黑格尔认为，在现代原子社会中，艺术只是一种爱好，哲学应该找回精神的自我认识，克服现代性。这些主题由栗原（文章“当艺术变得有趣”）、山内溥、佐藤、加藤、大田部、森本、木户、坂和座田在“当艺术开始，当艺术结束”（栗原编辑）中讨论。4.根据我们的研究（KURIHARA，ISAKA，KATO），先验唯心主义被投射为另一种历史观，即“自我意识的发展”，反对历史作为数量积累的进步观。