Origins of Human Irrationality

保罗·格赖斯（Paul Grice）关于行动与事件之间区别的论证的意义得到了澄清，他显然是对唐纳德·戴维森（Donald Davidson）的思想的批评，这些思想是现代行动理论的主导思想。在对格赖斯所坚持的关于理性和规范性的反自然主义的建构主义与关于价值的实在论共存的可能性进行了适当考察的同时，也从建构主义的角度阐明了如何解释人类的非理性（包括意志的软弱）与理性和规范性对立的根源。

The meaning of the arguments by Paul Grice about the distinction between actions and events was clarified, who was plainly critical of the ideas of Donald Davidson, the leading ideas of modern action theories. And, while the grounds for the coexisting possibility of the anti-naturalistic constructivism concerning rationality and normativeness and the realism concerning value, on which Grice insisted, were investigated properly, how to explain the origins of human irrationality, including weakness of the will, as against rationality and normativeness were clarified from the viewpoint of constructivism.