Comparative Studies on Social Security Systems in Southeast Asia

无论是“多样性资本主义”学派还是埃斯平·安德森的三种福利制度模型，都假定每个国家都有一个统一的福利制度。然而，这项研究认为，在新兴工业化的东南亚国家，两个质量不同的福利制度共存于每个国家;一个为正式部门，另一个为非正式部门。研究还表明，这两种福利制度在东南亚各国的组合存在很大差异，这种差异对各国工人的技能形成产生了影响。

Both the school of "Variety of Capitalism" and Espin Andersen's three models of Welfare Regimes assume that each country has one unified welfare regime. This study, however, argues that in newly industrializing Southeast Asian countries, two qualitatively different welfare regimes co-exist in each country ; one for the formal sector, and the other for the informal sector. It also reveals that the combination of those two welfare regimes in each Southeast Asian country differs considerably and such a difference exerts influence upon workers'skill formation in each country.