权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Efficiency of Public Water Area Development in the Presence of Compensation Rules for Loss of Fishers: Economic and Law Analysis

渔民损失补偿规则下公共水域开发效率：经济与法律分析

基本信息

批准号：
21651014
负责人：
OSAWA Masatoshi
金额：
$ 0.99万
依托单位：
Yokohama City University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research
财政年份：
2009
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2009 至 2011
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-21651014/
关键词：
合意形成漁業権放棄

项目摘要

The purpose of this research is to examine the efficiency of public water area development using both economic and law analyses. In particular, we examine (i) whether the existence of fishing rights and compensation rules for loss of fishers leads to efficient development, (ii) whether the rules of compensation influence the decision making of development, and (iii) what types of fishing rights are desirable in terms of social welfare.The main results of economic analysis are as follows. First, we obtain that explicit division of rights to the profits from fishing/fish stocks is needed for efficient development and harvesting. Second, who determines development and/or what kind of compensation rule is used influence the number of developed fishing districts and the amount of harvesting. For example, when the government determines the development area, the compensation according to the past fishing records leads to excess development and excess harvesting in terms of social welfare. On … More the other hand, the compensation according to the discounted present value of the fish stock leads to insufficient development.Moreover, the result of law analysis is as follows. Under the present Fisheries Act, it can be considered that each member of a fishery cooperative has her/his ownership interest in the profits of harvesting/fish stock. Demands for partition of the fishery (or the fish stock) and disposal of the partition are restricted for the benefit of cooperative resource management. When the present Fisheries Act was enacted in 1949, the fisheries rights under the former Fisheries Act were lapsed with compensation, and “new” fishing rights were given to fishers. Thus, the notion that a fishing right is given not to each fisher but to each community/cooperative, which was what fishing rights should be, is not valid under the present Fisheries Act.The result of the law analysis proves that the results from our economic analysis are effective to solve the problem on efficient development and harvesting. Less

本研究的目的是运用经济学和法学相结合的分析方法来考察公共水域开发的效率。特别是，我们考察了(I)捕鱼权和渔民损失补偿规则的存在是否会导致有效的发展，(Ii)补偿规则是否会影响发展决策，以及(Iii)从社会福利的角度来看，哪些类型的捕鱼权是可取的。首先，我们得到明确划分捕捞/鱼类种群利润的权利是有效开发和捕捞所必需的。第二，谁决定开发和/或使用哪种补偿规则影响发达捕鱼区的数量和捕捞量。例如，当政府确定开发区域时，根据过去的捕捞记录进行补偿，就会导致社会福利方面的过度开发和过度捕捞。在…上另一方面，按鱼种折现现值进行补偿导致开发不足。此外，法律分析结果如下。根据现行《渔业法》，可以认为渔业合作社的每个成员在捕捞/鱼类资源的利润中拥有所有权利益。为了合作资源管理的利益，对渔业(或鱼类种群)的分割和对分割的处理的要求受到限制。1949年颁布现行《渔业法》时，原《渔业法》规定的渔业权在补偿后失效，并赋予渔民“新的”捕鱼权。因此，在现行《渔业法》下，不是每个渔民而是每个社区/合作社都有捕鱼权的想法是不成立的。法律分析的结果证明，我们的经济分析结果有效地解决了高效开发和捕捞的问题。较少