权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

The Disputes on the Use of Coercive Power within the Atlantic Alliance and the Anti-Detente Advocates' Influence on it

大西洋联盟内部强制力使用争议及反缓和派对其的影响

基本信息

批准号：
21730148
负责人：
YOSHITOME Kota
金额：
$ 2.58万
依托单位：
Kanagawa University (2011-2012)Kansai Gaidai University (2009-2010)
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)
财政年份：
2009
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2009 至 2012
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-21730148/
关键词：
国際関係論対外政策論外交史国際理論国際協調論国際協力論

项目摘要

This research studies the validity of the so-called Western Order concept. The concept assumes that multinational policy coordination among the allies based upon the principle of ‘multilateralism’ is the basic orientation of the US world policy since the end of the Second World War. Accordingly, it claims that the US ‘unilateralism’ only irregularly and temporary appears due to the competitive nature of American domestic policy making process.This research analyzes the disputes among the members of the Atlantic Alliance regarding the use of coercive power since the 1970s to the present by focusing on the role of the anti-Detente advocates. It proved the following points. Firstly, the policy-makers those who supported the use of coercive power in the post-Cold War era has bipartisan and transnational roots in the anti-Detente advocates. Secondly, from the view point of ‘action’, the allies’ influence on the US policy-process is limited. Thirdly, the US governments in the1990s strategically perused foreign policies in order to maintain the leadership within the Atlantic Alliance. Therefore, the US unilateralism emerged as a result of American governments’ strategic decisions that were influenced by the anti-Detente advocates.

本研究探讨所谓西方秩序概念的有效性。这一概念认为，以“多边主义”原则为基础的盟国间的多国政策协调是二战结束以来美国世界政策的基本取向。文章认为，由于美国国内政策制定过程的竞争性，美国的“单边主义”只是不定期的、暂时的。本文分析了20世纪70年代至今大西洋联盟成员国之间关于使用强制力的争论，重点关注反缓和派的作用。它证明了以下几点。首先，那些在后冷战时代支持使用强制力量的政策制定者在反缓和的倡导者中具有两党和跨国根源。其次，从“行动”的角度看，盟国对美国政策过程的影响是有限的。第三，美国政府在90年代对外交政策进行了战略审视，以保持在大西洋联盟中的领导地位。因此，美国的单边主义是美国政府在反缓和派影响下的战略决策的结果。