Matching new empirical methods of antitrust to competition law decision-making

本研究探讨了反垄断经济学的理论分析和实证分析如何在个人推理过程中相互作用，形成不同的法律结论。因为我们认为信息是显而易见的，所以我们不那么依赖潜在的理论来理解信息。最近的反垄断量化技术将人们的目光从当前法律标准的好坏上转移到了一边。对于那些传统智慧对其现状有很大影响的领域，更新反垄断规则是当务之急。

This research explored how theoretical and empirical analyses of antitrust economics interact within personal reasoning process to form different legal conclusions. As we perceive the information as obvious, we rely less on underlying theories to understand the information. Recent quantitative techniques of antitrust turn one's eye away from how good or poor are the current legal standards. Updating antitrust rules is urgent for those areas where conventional wisdom has much influence on their current status.