Theoretical and Empirical Analyses on the Possibility of Water Quality Trading
水质交易可能性的理论与实证分析
基本信息
- 批准号:23730250
- 负责人:
- 金额:$ 1.58万
- 依托单位:
- 依托单位国家:日本
- 项目类别:Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)
- 财政年份:2011
- 资助国家:日本
- 起止时间:2011 至 2012
- 项目状态:已结题
- 来源:
- 关键词:
项目摘要
This research project investigated the viability of water quality trading (WQT) as a practical water quality conservation policy. We examined, theoretically and empirically, the welfare properties of the two WQT systems, the trading ratio system (TRS), proposed by Hung and Shaw (JEEM, 2005), and the damage-denominated trading ratio system (DTRS), proposed by Farrow et al.(Land, 2005). Our main findings were(i) TRS tends to preclude welfare-improving trades whereas DTRS tends to encourage welfare-decreasing trades under realistic conditions of river systems(ii) their relative efficiency depends on the geographic distribution of polluting sources in the river basin, and(iii) nonetheless, the efficiency loss due to failing to get the total supply of permits is larger than that due to failing to get the spatial prices of permits. Furthermore, we identified the total maximum daily load (TMDL) regulation and its associated WQT policy for phosphorus pollution in the Minnesota River basin as a study area for our empirical research. We estimated the (marginal) abatement costs of phosphorus removal at 44 water treatment plants under the TMDL regulation. The project is currently at the stage of implementing our empirical simulation work using the estimated abatement costs.
本研究探讨水质交易(WQT)作为一种实用的水质保护政策的可行性。我们从理论和实证两个方面考察了两种WQT制度的福利性质,即Hung和Shaw(Jeem,2005)提出的交易比率制度(TRS)和Farrow等人(land,2005)提出的损害计价交易比率制度(DTRS)。我们的主要发现是:(I)在现实的水系条件下,TRS倾向于排除福利改善交易,而DTRs倾向于鼓励福利减少的交易;(Ii)它们的相对效率取决于流域内污染源的地理分布;(Iii)尽管如此,由于无法获得许可证的总供应量而造成的效率损失仍大于因无法获得许可证的空间价格而造成的效率损失。此外,我们确定了明尼苏达州流域磷污染的总最大日负荷(TMDL)调节及其相关的WQT政策作为我们的实证研究区域。根据TMDL法规,我们估算了44个水处理厂的除磷(边际)成本。该项目目前正处于利用估计的减排成本实施我们的经验模拟工作的阶段。
项目成果
期刊论文数量(0)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
Water‐quality trading: Can we get the prices of pollution right?
- DOI:10.1002/2014wr015560
- 发表时间:2015-05
- 期刊:
- 影响因子:5.4
- 作者:Yoshifumi Konishi;J. Coggins;Bin Wang-
- 通讯作者:Yoshifumi Konishi;J. Coggins;Bin Wang-
Water Quality Trading: Can We Get the Price of Pollution Right?
水质交易:我们能正确定价污染吗?
- DOI:
- 发表时间:2012
- 期刊:
- 影响因子:0
- 作者:R. Nomura;T. Ohkawa;M. Okamura;and M. Tawada;野村良一;Yoshifumi Konishi or Jay Coggins;野村良一;Jay Coggins or Yoshifumi Konishi;R. Nomura;Jay Coggins
- 通讯作者:Jay Coggins
Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Summer Conference
环境与资源经济学家协会夏季会议
- DOI:
- 发表时间:2013
- 期刊:
- 影响因子:0
- 作者:R. Nomura;T. Ohkawa;M. Okamura;and M. Tawada;野村良一;Yoshifumi Konishi or Jay Coggins
- 通讯作者:Yoshifumi Konishi or Jay Coggins
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}
KONISHI Yoshifumi其他文献
KONISHI Yoshifumi的其他文献
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
{{ truncateString('KONISHI Yoshifumi', 18)}}的其他基金
Theoretical and Empirical Analyses on the Long-run Impact of Environmental Regulations on Industry Dynamics
环境规制对行业动态长期影响的理论与实证分析
- 批准号:
25780171 - 财政年份:2013
- 资助金额:
$ 1.58万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)