Theoretical, practical and law-comparative research on the new tendency of the environmental law and the environmental policy

从我们为在东京举行的日本-德国联合研讨会(1998年4月)进行的筹备研究、研讨会本身和我们为在弗赖堡举行的第二次联合研讨会(2000年9月)进行的筹备研究中，我们了解到：德国和日本的国家都在宪法的传统框架内处理科学和技术发展对环境的破坏问题，即：首先，通过在宪法中引入新的环境保护条款作为国家目标(德国)，或者第二次通过制定大量将法律和条例具体化的宪法，将环境权作为生命权(第25条)或追求幸福的权利(第13条)或两者兼而有之的衍生(日本)，第三，通过发展与这些法律和条例相一致的行政和司法。但是传统的…框架已经不能满足环境问题的解决更多的土地。有必要采取预防和综合措施，而不是事后和个别补救措施。这不仅是解决当代人的问题的需要，也是为子孙后代着想的需要。C.由于行政和法律专家在这一问题上无能为力，需要科学和技术专家参与。D.由于个别国家的解决办法不够充分，需要所有国家进行全球合作。因此，宪法思维框架的修正是必要的。首先，宪法必须被视为迫使国家为人民的生存利益采取一切必要措施的法律规范体系，而不是限制国家权力的法律规范体系。其次，宪法必须被视为组织实现国家任务的所有体制和非体制因素的参与和合作的法律规范体系，而不是仅规范国家活动的法律规范体系。较少

From our preparative study for the Japanese-German joint symposium in Tokyo(April 1998), the symposium itself and our preparative study for the second joint symposium in Freiburg (September 2000) results following learning :The state both in Germany and Japan hat dealt with the destruction of the environment as the result of development of science and technologie within the traditional framework of the constitution, namely, firstly by introducing of new article of environmental protection as the state goal in the constitution (Germany) or by proposing of environmental right as the derivative from the right to live (article 25) or from the right to pursuit of happiness (article 13) or from both (Japan) secondarily by enacting of lots of the constitution concretizing laws and ordinances, thirdly by developing the administration and the judicature conformed to those laws and ordinances. But the traditional framework is not enough to the solution of the problem of the environment by follow … More ing grounds. a necessity of preventive and comprehensive measures, instead of post-factum and individual remedies. b. necessesity of not only solution for present generation, but also of consideration for future generation. c. necessity of participation of experts in science and technology on account of inability of experts of administration and law in this problem. d. necessity of the global cooperation of all states on account of insuffuiciency of solution by a individual state. Theore the revision of framework of thinking on the constitution is necessary. Firstly the constitution must be thought rather as the legal norm-system that obliges the state to take all necessary measures for the existential interest of people than as the legal norm-system of limitation of state power. Secondarily the constitution must be thought rather as the legal norm-system that organized the participation and the cooperation of all institutional and non-institutional factors for realization of tasks of state than as the legal norm-system that rules only state activities. Less