近代的構築環境の日伊比較研究

从先前获得的理论分析开始，继续进行实地研究，以收集有关所选研究案例保存条件的所有最重要数据。其中最重要的一次是2015年6月参观了群观岛的内部建筑。草图和摄影调查是基本的，同时采访了周围的当地居民。建立一个完整的英文数据库，用于与现有的非学术性日本数据库进行比较，结果在第四届国际会议上公布。（土耳其伊兹密尔，2015年5月）完成实地研究后，再次有必要收集一份关于西方遗址再利用和与城市环境重新连接的最后参考书目，以在两个不同的城市中实施比较方案。比较的主要方面之一是分析废墟研究对人类感知建筑空间的影响以及日本文化为何以如此不同的方式处理这一主题。在研究的最后阶段，我提出了不同的解决方案，这些解决方案可能会解决当前辩论中的关键点和问题，并提出具体的重新分配假设。这些建议在2015年国际会议EAAC（韩国光州，2015年11月）上提出，并将在其他研究中进一步发展。所有的最终数据可能会被收集在一个单一的出版物或一本书中，在欧洲和日本出版。

Starting from the previously obtained theoretical analysis, field researches for collect all the most important data on the preservation condition of the selected study cases have continued. The most important of trips have been the visit to the internal buildings of Gunkanjima in June 2015. Sketches and photographic surveys were fundamental together with interviews to local inhabitants of the surroundings. The creation of a complete database in English has been used for a comparison with existing not academic Japanese databases and the results were presented at the 4th International Conference (Izmir, Turkey, May 2015).Once finished the field research it became again necessary to collect a finalbibliography on Western examples of ruins reuse and reconnection with urban environment to implement the comparison scheme within the two different approaches.One of the main aspects of the comparison have been the analysis of the influence that ruin study had in human perception of architectural space and why Japanese culture approached in a so different way to this topic. In the last stage of the research I proposed different solutions that might fix critical points and questions in the current debate, proposing concrete reappropriation hypotheses. These proposals were presented at the International Conference EAAC 2015 (Gwangju, South Korea, November 2015) and will be further developed in other researches. All the final data will be possibly collected in a single publication or a book to be published in both Europe and Japan.