近代的構築環境の日伊比較研究

从之前获得的理论分析开始，对所选研究案例保存状况的所有最重要数据的实地研究仍在继续。最重要的一次旅行是2015年6月对冈坎吉马内部建筑的访问。素描和摄影调查以及对周围当地居民的采访是基本的。建立一个完整的英文数据库被用来与现有的非学术日本数据库进行比较，结果在第四届国际会议(土耳其伊兹密尔，2015年5月)上公布。完成实地研究后，再次有必要收集关于废墟再利用和与城市环境重新连接的西方范例的最终参考书目，以在两种不同的方法中实施比较方案。比较的主要方面之一是分析废墟研究对人类对建筑空间的感知的影响，以及为什么日本文化以如此不同的方式对待这个话题。在研究的最后阶段，我提出了不同的解决方案，可能会解决当前辩论中的关键点和问题，提出了具体的重新挪用假设。这些建议已在2015年东亚和加勒比国际会议(2015年11月，韩国光州)上提出，并将在其他研究中得到进一步发展。所有的最终数据可能会被收集在一份出版物中，或者一本将在欧洲和日本出版的书中。

Starting from the previously obtained theoretical analysis, field researches for collect all the most important data on the preservation condition of the selected study cases have continued. The most important of trips have been the visit to the internal buildings of Gunkanjima in June 2015. Sketches and photographic surveys were fundamental together with interviews to local inhabitants of the surroundings. The creation of a complete database in English has been used for a comparison with existing not academic Japanese databases and the results were presented at the 4th International Conference (Izmir, Turkey, May 2015).Once finished the field research it became again necessary to collect a finalbibliography on Western examples of ruins reuse and reconnection with urban environment to implement the comparison scheme within the two different approaches.One of the main aspects of the comparison have been the analysis of the influence that ruin study had in human perception of architectural space and why Japanese culture approached in a so different way to this topic. In the last stage of the research I proposed different solutions that might fix critical points and questions in the current debate, proposing concrete reappropriation hypotheses. These proposals were presented at the International Conference EAAC 2015 (Gwangju, South Korea, November 2015) and will be further developed in other researches. All the final data will be possibly collected in a single publication or a book to be published in both Europe and Japan.