INspiring and ANchoring TrUst in Science

IANUS项目通过促进研究作为一个共同创造和包容的过程，对社会价值、关注和需求敏感，加强了对科学的应有信任。信任必须受到知识生产的透明度和可信赖性的启发，并通过积极参与和服务社会来巩固，作为科学运作方式的一部分。我们的核心目标：(a)使公民和利益相关者能够区分有效的信任和毫无根据的信任；(b)使它们能够处理科学知识固有的不确定性和认识的多元性；(c)使研究人员能够通过彻底改变方法、使研究具有包容性、透明和对社会需要和关切作出反应、降低研究与社会之间的障碍来促进信任；(d)使研究人员能够进行有关的、投入的和以价值为导向的研究，同时避免偏见、意识形态偏见和利益冲突。IANUS的首字母缩略词指的是门户之神Janus（拉丁语为IANUS），既关注知识生产过程的内部，也关注外部。对科学的信任从来不是理所当然的。牢固的信任是良好的、互惠的和知情的。在框架计划资助的其他项目的见解和成果的基础上，IANUS将(a)绘制与科学信任相关的项目和话语的景观；(b)发展其概念框架；(c)对信任科学的条件进行参与性研究；(d)采取具体行动，通过共同创造和参与加强信任；(e)向科学和社会的主要利益相关者（如资助机构、大学、研究团队、教育工作者、媒体）提供政策建议；(f)为科学家和社会利益相关者之间的互动和参与创造平台，以促进信任。社会挑战的复杂性和紧迫性迅速加剧，对科学的信任决定了我们有效应对这些挑战的能力

The IANUS project strengthens warranted trust in science by fostering participation in research as a co-creative and inclusive process, sensitive to societal values, concerns and needs. Trust must be inspired by transparency and trustworthiness of knowledge production, and anchored by actively involving and serving society, as part of the modus operandi of science. Our core objectives: (a) Enable citizens and stakeholders to distinguish valid from unfounded trust; (b) Enable them to deal with the uncertainties and epistemic pluralism inherent in scientific knowledge; (c) Enable researchers to foster trust through radical methodological change, making research inclusive, transparent and responsive to societal needs and concerns, lowering barriers between research and society; (d) Enable researchers to conduct relevant, engaged and value-driven research while foregoing partiality, ideological biases and conflicts of interests. The acronym IANUS refers to the deity Janus of gateways (ianus in Latin), looking both at the inside and at the outside of the knowledge production process. Trust in science is never a given. Robust trust is well-placed, reciprocal and informed. Building on insights and results from other projects funded under Framework Programmes, IANUS will (a) map the landscape of projects and discourses relevant for trust in science; (b) develop its conceptual framework; (c) conduct participatory research into conditions of trust in science; (d) initiate concrete actions for strengthening trust through co-creation and engagement; (e) provide policy recommendation to key stakeholders in science and society (e.g. funding bodies, universities, research teams, educators, media); (f) create platforms for interaction and engagement between scientists and societal stakeholders to foster trust. The complexity and urgency of societal challenges has rapidly intensified, and trust in science determined our ability to address these challenges effectively