权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

An exploration of the relation between the concepts of 'community' and 'future' in philosophy

哲学中“共同体”与“未来”概念的关系探讨

基本信息

批准号：
AH/J50059X/1
负责人：
Johan Siebers
金额：
$ 2.55万
依托单位：
University of Central Lancashire
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Research Grant
财政年份：
2011
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2011 至无数据
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FJ50059X%2F1
关键词：
exploration relation between concepts community

项目摘要

This scoping study and research review has examined a range of contemporary and historical philosophical approaches to understanding the relation between the concepts of 'community' and 'future'. In two lines of research an overview of six theoretical strands was produced, including virtue ethics, philosophical liberalism, the capabilities-approach, recognition theory, the philosophy of G. Agamben (strand 1) and E. Bloch (strand 2).It emerged that futurity and future-orientation, although implicitly present, are marginalised as explicit objects of an ontological enquiry in most theories. As a result, philosophers, whilst dealing with ethical relations between present and future community, do so without a sufficient ontological foundation of the relations in question. The 'not yet' of the future is ontologically complex, as is its impact on the nature of community.To investigate it deeper, the linearity and uni-directionality of future orientation needs to be contested. The future as future needs to be acknowledged as a pool of potentialities and not merely as present reality in waiting. This warrants an exploration of qualitative and relationalaspects of future and future orientation. At the same time the relation between the complex notyet and the constitutive factors of community needs to be articulated.

这项范围研究和研究回顾考察了一系列当代和历史的哲学方法来理解“社区”和“未来”概念之间的关系。在两条研究路线中，对六个理论流派进行了概述，包括美德伦理学、哲学自由主义、能力方法、承认理论、G.阿甘本（流派1）和E.布洛赫（流派2）的哲学。结果表明，未来性和未来导向虽然隐含地存在，但在大多数理论中被边缘化为本体论探究的明确对象。因此，哲学家在处理当前和未来共同体之间的伦理关系时，并没有为所讨论的关系提供足够的本体论基础。未来的“尚未”在本体论上是复杂的，它对社区本质的影响也是如此。为了更深入地研究它，未来导向的线性性和单向性需要受到质疑。未来作为未来，需要被视为一个潜力库，而不仅仅是等待中的现实。这需要对未来和未来定位的定性和关系方面进行探索。同时，复杂的事物与社区的构成因素之间的关系需要阐明。