权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

New everyday practices of free speech on campus: Beyond racialised and religious stereotypes

校园言论自由的新日常实践：超越种族和宗教刻板印象

基本信息

批准号：
AH/V012649/1
负责人：
Alison Scott-Baumann
金额：
$ 10.27万
依托单位：
School of Oriental and African Studies
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Research Grant
财政年份：
2021
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2021 至无数据
项目状态：
未结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FV012649%2F1
关键词：
New everyday practices free speech

项目摘要

SummaryBuilding on robust research findings about discrimination against Muslims on campus, this Follow on Fund will help universities to tackle religious, racial and gender discrimination by showing them how to encourage and facilitate difficult discussions, instead of avoiding them. Follow-on funds can address matters that could not be dealt with in the main research project and here we wish to draw attention to: a) racism that goes beyond the Muslim communities on campus, and b) potential opportunities to reduce racism through open yet civil discussions. The findings from AHRC/ESRC 2015-18: Representing Islam on campus AH/M00841X/1 demonstrate that Muslim staff and students are often denied a voice by discriminatory practices and negative stereotypes triggered by skin colour, clothing or other perceived differences. This is a form of silencing or testimonial injustice: Muslim staff believe they are not considered to have opinions worth hearing, discussing or sharing. As such, they self-censor to avoid conflict. Our findings resonate with recent research on National Health Service (NHS) staff of colour, who also report finding themselves ignored or not heard when raising concerns during the COVID-19 crisis. In the AHRC project, we noted similar matters but were unable to explore these as they went beyond the focus of Islam on campus: now it is urgent that they are shared and explored in discussion. So firstly, this Follow on Fund will disseminate our research findings and show the ways in which the student voice is silenced. We will engage key players actively in discussing these findings about Islam using a group discussion approach called Community of Inquiry. This approach facilitates honesty and deliberation in the face of controversial evidence. Providing solid evidence is only part of changing someone's views: engaging actively in discussion about such evidence is also necessary. By such means racism on campus can be recognised and addressed. Secondly, the key finding to which we could not do justice during the project involves addressing broad spectrum racism directed towards those considered different. We were told of covert and overt racism towards Black students and staff, and the negative stereotyping of Jewish students. As the current focus upon inequalities in the NHS resonates with our findings, we will also work with medical students to disseminate our work more widely, on university campuses that also provide medical training. The core team provides expertise in Judaism, Black lives and Islam to support universities. The Community of Inquiry group discussion approach facilitates trust, openness and civility - while always working towards group solutions. We will deliver significant economic, social, cultural and policy impacts by developing this into a training package for students and staff. The unspoken, discriminatory tendencies amongst students and staff can be reduced and replaced with critical dialogues and anti-discriminatory practices.

摘要-基于对校园内穆斯林歧视的强有力的研究结果，该后续基金将帮助大学解决宗教、种族和性别歧视问题，向它们展示如何鼓励和促进困难的讨论，而不是回避它们。后续资金可以解决在主要研究项目中无法处理的问题，在此，我们希望提请注意：a)超越校园穆斯林社区的种族主义，以及b)通过公开的民间讨论减少种族主义的潜在机会。AHRC/ESRC 2015-18：在校园中代表伊斯兰教AH/M00841X/1的调查结果表明，穆斯林教职员工和学生经常被肤色、服装或其他感知到的差异引发的歧视性做法和负面刻板印象剥夺了发言权。这是一种沉默或证言不公正的形式：穆斯林员工认为他们的观点不值得听取、讨论或分享。因此，他们会自我审查，以避免冲突。我们的发现与最近对国民健康服务有色人种工作人员的研究相呼应，这些有色人种工作人员还报告说，他们发现自己在新冠肺炎危机期间提出担忧时被忽视或没有被听到。在AHRC项目中，我们注意到了类似的问题，但无法探讨这些问题，因为它们超出了校园里伊斯兰教的重点：现在迫切需要在讨论中分享和探索这些问题。因此，首先，这个后续基金将传播我们的研究成果，并展示如何压制学生的声音。我们将邀请主要参与者积极参与讨论这些关于伊斯兰教的调查结果，使用一种名为调查共同体的小组讨论方法。这种方法有助于在面对有争议的证据时诚实和慎重。提供确凿的证据只是改变某人观点的一部分：积极参与关于此类证据的讨论也是必要的。通过这样的方式，校园里的种族主义可以被识别和解决。第二，我们在项目期间无法公正处理的关键发现涉及解决针对那些被认为不同的人的广泛种族主义问题。我们被告知针对黑人学生和教职员工的隐蔽和公开的种族主义，以及对犹太学生的负面刻板印象。随着目前对国民健康保险制度中不平等现象的关注与我们的发现产生共鸣，我们也将与医科学生合作，在也提供医学培训的大学校园里更广泛地传播我们的工作。核心团队提供犹太教、黑人生活和伊斯兰教方面的专业知识，以支持大学。调查社区小组讨论方法促进信任、开放和文明--同时始终致力于小组解决方案。我们将通过将其发展为学生和工作人员的培训包来产生重大的经济、社会、文化和政策影响。学生和教职员工之间未言明的歧视倾向可以减少，取而代之的是批判性对话和反歧视做法。