Visual Justifications for Ontologies

本体的视觉论证

基本信息

  • 批准号:
    EP/M016323/2
  • 负责人:
  • 金额:
    $ 6.81万
  • 依托单位:
  • 依托单位国家:
    英国
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
  • 财政年份:
    2016
  • 资助国家:
    英国
  • 起止时间:
    2016 至 无数据
  • 项目状态:
    已结题

项目摘要

Ontologies are a way of reasoning about data in an efficient manner. Ontologies are increasingly prevalent in a range of applications, including the Semantic Web, medicine and law. The development and maintenance of ontologies are skilled tasks requiring knowledge of logical reasoning and symbolic notations. However, the wide variety of stakeholders for each ontology may not have the necessary skill set to perform ontology engineering effectively. Given the critical systems in which ontologies are used, it is of paramount importance that the ontologies encode exactly the information intended. Ontologies containing errors, called incoherent ontologies, undergo debugging or repair by an ontology engineer. Extant ontology reasoners provide a justification for the incoherence. However, interpreting the justification is a non-trivial and difficult task. Even if the engineer understands the domain of the ontology, for example medicine, and the symbolic notation in which the justification is represented, they could still struggle to debug the ontology. It is especially difficult to debug the ontology without unintentionally removing intended behaviour. This project will use concept diagrams to visualise justifications to reduce the burden on the ontology engineer. Using concept diagrams will help both the understanding of the problem and suggest appropriate repairs to the ontology. The project will provide a number of different visualisations of common bugs in ontologies and empirically test the effectiveness of each. Through this process, the project team will be able to develop effective visual justifications. Using real-world examples of ontologies for data privacy supplied by the project partner HERE (a Nokia company) the visual justifications will then be tested against equivalent symbolic and natural language justifications.
本体是以一种有效的方式对数据进行推理的方法。本体在一系列应用中越来越流行,包括语义网、医学和法律。本体的开发和维护是需要逻辑推理和符号符号知识的熟练任务。然而,每个本体的各种涉众可能没有必要的技能集来有效地执行本体工程。对于使用本体的关键系统,本体准确地编码所需的信息是至关重要的。包含错误的本体,称为不连贯的本体,由本体工程师调试或修复。现存的本体论推理者为这种不一致性提供了理由。然而,解释这一理由是一项重要而艰巨的任务。即使工程师理解本体论的领域,例如医学,以及表示证明的符号符号,他们仍然可能难以调试本体论。在不无意中删除预期行为的情况下调试本体尤其困难。这个项目将使用概念图来可视化证明,以减轻本体工程师的负担。使用概念图将有助于理解问题并对本体提出适当的修复建议。该项目将提供本体中常见错误的许多不同的可视化,并对每个可视化的有效性进行实证测试。通过这个过程,项目团队将能够开发出有效的视觉证明。使用项目合作伙伴HERE(一家诺基亚公司)提供的数据隐私本体的真实示例,然后将对视觉证明与等效的符号和自然语言证明进行测试。

项目成果

期刊论文数量(4)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
Antipattern Comprehension: An Empirical Evaluation
反模式理解:实证评估
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
    2016
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
    T. Hou
  • 通讯作者:
    T. Hou
Implementation Planning for Integrating Depression Screening in Diabetes Mellitus and HIV Clinics in Botswana.
博茨瓦纳糖尿病和艾滋病毒诊所整合抑郁症筛查的实施计划。
Measuring perceived clutter in concept diagrams
{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}

Peter Chapman其他文献

Comparing drivers’ visual attention at Junctions in Real and Simulated Environments
  • DOI:
    10.1016/j.apergo.2019.05.005
  • 发表时间:
    2019-10-01
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
  • 作者:
    Chloe J. Robbins;Harriet A. Allen;Peter Chapman
  • 通讯作者:
    Peter Chapman
Short Term Memory and Peripheral Vision at Junctions
交界处的短期记忆和周边视觉
  • DOI:
    10.2139/ssrn.4291158
  • 发表时间:
    2023
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
    Peter Chapman;Seda Orhan;Lily Moore
  • 通讯作者:
    Lily Moore
Actuarial, probability of initial appropriate AICD shocks over long-term follow-up
  • DOI:
    10.1016/0735-1097(90)92514-3
  • 发表时间:
    1990-02-01
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
  • 作者:
    Jule Wetherbee;Paul Troup;Paul Peterson;Ranjan Thakur;Vickie Tucker;Jan Veseth-Rogers;Peter Chapman;G.Hossein Almassi;Gordon Olinger
  • 通讯作者:
    Gordon Olinger
Sixty-nine-year follow-up of a McKee radial head arthroplasty
  • DOI:
    10.1016/j.jse.2014.09.030
  • 发表时间:
    2015-01-01
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
  • 作者:
    Paul M. Robinson;Peter Chapman
  • 通讯作者:
    Peter Chapman
Education to improve cancer care in rural South Australia.
旨在改善南澳大利亚农村地区癌症护理的教育。
  • DOI:
    10.22605/rrh1147
  • 发表时间:
    2009
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    2.1
  • 作者:
    E. Hoon;J. Newbury;Peter Chapman;J. Price
  • 通讯作者:
    J. Price

Peter Chapman的其他文献

{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

{{ truncateString('Peter Chapman', 18)}}的其他基金

Visual Justifications for Ontologies
本体的视觉论证
  • 批准号:
    EP/M016323/1
  • 财政年份:
    2015
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.81万
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
Bacterial Metabolism of Chlorinated Benzenoid Compounds
氯化苯化合物的细菌代谢
  • 批准号:
    7618793
  • 财政年份:
    1976
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.81万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Bacterial Metabolism of Chlorinated Benzenoid Compounds
氯化苯化合物的细菌代谢
  • 批准号:
    7406908
  • 财政年份:
    1974
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.81万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant

相似海外基金

Anisotropic yielding in AM Ti-6Al-4V: Experimental methods, models, and case study justifications
AM Ti-6Al-4V 中的各向异性屈服:实验方法、模型和案例研究理由
  • 批准号:
    2592733
  • 财政年份:
    2021
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.81万
  • 项目类别:
    Studentship
Excellence in Research: Attitudes, Motivations, and Justifications Surrounding Interpersonal Aggression
卓越的研究:围绕人际攻击的态度、动机和理由
  • 批准号:
    1856304
  • 财政年份:
    2019
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.81万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Doctoral Dissertation Research: Explaining Presidents' Use of Humanitarian Justifications for Military Intervention.
博士论文研究:解释总统利用人道主义理由进行军事干预。
  • 批准号:
    1559741
  • 财政年份:
    2016
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.81万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Visual Justifications for Ontologies
本体的视觉论证
  • 批准号:
    EP/M016323/1
  • 财政年份:
    2015
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.81万
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
The role of ideology, belief and commitment in motivations, justifications and catalysts for action in the face of uncertainty
面对不确定性时,意识形态、信仰和承诺在行动的动机、理由和催化剂中的作用
  • 批准号:
    ES/K000306/1
  • 财政年份:
    2013
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.81万
  • 项目类别:
    Fellowship
Science, Business, and Ethics: Justifications in the Pharmaceutical Industry
科学、商业和道德:制药行业的理由
  • 批准号:
    193436
  • 财政年份:
    2009
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.81万
  • 项目类别:
    Operating Grants
Explanation of Quantitative Systems: A General Approach to Providing Justifications to Non-Technical Users
定量系统的解释:向非技术用户提供理由的通用方法
  • 批准号:
    9505486
  • 财政年份:
    1995
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.81万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Conditions which may affect the judgments of goodness and badness in school children - focussed on excuses and justifications-
可能影响学童好坏判断的条件 - 重点是借口和理由 -
  • 批准号:
    03610040
  • 财政年份:
    1991
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.81万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (C)
Research Initiation - Bus Preemption System Justifications At Urban Intersections
研究启动 - 城市十字路口公交车优先系统的理由
  • 批准号:
    7908105
  • 财政年份:
    1979
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.81万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
School policy ideas of the Alternative for Germany in the federal states: Issue setting, strategies and justifications for dealing with heterogeneity
德国替代方案在联邦各州的学校政策理念:问题设置、处理异质性的策略和理由
  • 批准号:
    522305017
  • 财政年份:
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.81万
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grants
{{ showInfoDetail.title }}

作者:{{ showInfoDetail.author }}

知道了