Choice and Inequality in Public Service Access and Outcomes: The Case of Healthcare

点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要

The previous Labour government introduced two policies that increased the choice that patients in England have over where to receive hospital treatment. First, GPs were required to offer their patients a choice over which hospital to attend for a first outpatient appointment. Second, new hospitals opened that treat NHS patients but are owned by private companies. This gives NHS patients a greater number of hospitals to choose between. Under the current government, patient choice is set to increase yet further. There are also moves to increase choice in other public services, such as education with the introduction of Free Schools. This research agenda will examine whether increased patient choice has lead to a change in inequalities in the use of NHS-funded services and, consequently, patient outcomes. Successive governments have advocated choice for two reasons. First, because they believe that patients value the ability to choose for its own sake. Second, because choice can generate pressure for NHS hospitals to improve quality, so as to attract patients. There is evidence that offering patients a choice did indeed lead to improvements in average hospital quality. Much less has been written on how the policies affected different types of people or on the impact of the new privately owned hospitals. Even if choice leads to an average improvement in hospital quality, it is still important to understand who was affected by the policies. Equity in access to healthcare is a founding principle of the NHS. Moreover, if certain hospitals, particularly those that are privately owned, only treat particular types of patients, this may limit the competitive pressure needed to drive quality and could impact the cost-effectiveness of the policies. The research programme will focus on three main questions. The first is whether some patient groups have responded to the choice policies more than others. Are younger and richer patients more likely to use the new private treatment centres? Have some groups received a greater than expected share in the increase in the number of operations performed over the past decade? What are the implications of any change in the inequality in use of NHS services on inequalities in patient health outcomes?The second question is how choice operates for hospital treatments where the new privately owned hospitals do not operate. I will focus on the example of maternity care, or childbirth. As many women have more than one child, I can also test whether mothers use their own experiences when making decisions about where to give birth. In particular, whether a mother's experience during childbirth affects her decisions during subsequent pregnancies. Since some factors that make childbirth difficult, such as the mother's age or weight, might also affect future pregnancies, I will focus only on the impact of random factors that affect the quality of maternity care. One possible example is whether the birth occurred at the weekend, when there are likely to be fewer support staff. I will then compare the responses of mothers to their own experiences to their responses to public information, such as publicised scandals at local maternity units.The final question is how future or potential policies to increase patient choice could affect the inequalities in where and whether patients are treated. The first two research questions will assess the impacts of past policies, but cannot predict the future. I will use a model of patient behaviour to illustrate the potential effects of alternative policies. This may help policy-makers to choose between policy options or make changes to the design of proposed reforms.All the projects will use the NHS records on inpatients, which include information on all those patients that hospitals expected to stay overnight and all mothers who give birth in hospital. The first project will also make use of a biannual survey that follows a group of people aged 50 and over.