课题基金 / 基金详情

Seminar series on genetics, technology, security and justice. Crossing, contesting and comparing boundaries

Seminar series on genetics, technology, security and justice. Crossing, contesting and comparing boundaries
关于遗传学、技术、安全和司法的系列研讨会。
批准号:
ES/N008626/1
负责人:
Robin Williams
金额:
$3.86万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Research Grant
财政年份:
2015
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2015 至 --

项目摘要

项目成果

Robin Williams的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
安全关切-犯罪、恐怖主义、大规模死亡暴行和灾难-是新技术发展的关键驱动力,人类遗传学研究在这方面发挥了重要贡献。DNA技术为识别人体遗骸和制作有助于为复杂犯罪提供证据的信息提供了重要资源。有时候,新的法医技术被迅速采用,而对其进行适当的监管却被推迟,直到在某些具体情况下,在部署后出现了意外的用途和影响(例如,在刑事DNA数据库中无限期储存儿童的DNA样本)。在其他情况下,在技术实施之前进行了广泛的立法审议,有时被否决。有必要整理关于采用法医遗传技术带来的机遇和挑战的现有知识,以确保这些技术尊重隐私和人的尊严。(1)比较DNA在安全和健康方面的用途:研讨会将确定安全和健康两个领域之间的目标,责任,义务和基本价值观的差异。例如,虽然知情同意问题可能是在医疗保健和健康保险中使用遗传学的核心,但司法和安全背景优先考虑迅速识别危险的罪犯,在法庭上出示可信的证据,或明确识别受害者。这为参与者准备了以下工作。(2)确定在安全背景下使用医疗数据的问题:研讨会将探讨通过使用新型法医遗传技术将医疗数据用于安全工作时出现的实际和潜在问题。迄今为止,DNA的法医用途包括将来自犯罪现场、身份不明的人或志愿者的样本与现有的DNA图谱(例如DNA数据库)进行匹配。预计新技术将提供更多关于样本捐赠者的信息,例如他们的外表,年龄,甚至行为。这可能会影响社会理解和对待健康数据的方式,特别是在面临严重犯罪、恐怖主义或大规模灾难威胁时,信息至关重要。研讨会还将探讨这些新技术是如何被使用的,并比较其应用的法律的和伦理背景。(3)比较各国法医遗传技术的使用情况:DNA技术和数据越来越多地跨越国界使用。各国在刑法、隐私立法和警察做法方面的差异使这一过程非常复杂。例如,在警察部队可以要求谁提供DNA样本方面存在差异。研讨会将邀请来自欧洲和美国的顶尖学者,比较各种司法管辖区的实践以及公共和专业辩论。研讨会将汇集英国和海外的学术研究人员、政策制定者和来自警务机构、商业法医服务提供者、公共部门组织和民间社会团体的从业人员,讨论如何在尊重自由的同时利用这些技术来支持安全。将建立一个有关人员网络,以传播现有研究和设计新的研究,为联合王国关于利用遗传信息应对正义和安全的社会挑战的政策和做法提供信息。
英文摘要
Security concerns - about crime, terrorism, mass death atrocities and disasters - are a key driver for the development of new technologies, and human genetics research has played an important contribution here. DNA technologies provide vital resources for the identification of human remains and the production of information that can help to provide evidence in complex crimes. Sometimes, new forensic technologies have been adopted rapidly while their adequate regulation has been delayed until, in specific instances, unintended uses and impacts have emerged after deployment (e.g. indefinite storage of DNA samples from children in criminal DNA databanks). In other cases, extensive legislative deliberations have preceded, and sometimes rejected, technology implementation. There is a need to collate existing knowledge about the opportunities and challenges that accompany the adoption of forensic genetic technologies to ensure that they respect privacy and human dignity.Three linked observations will shape the focus of the seminar series. (1) Comparing DNA uses in security and health contexts: Seminars will identify differences in aims, responsibilities, obligations, and underlying values between the two domains of security and health. For example, whilst issues of informed consent may be central to the use of genetics in healthcare and health insurance, justice and security contexts prioritise speedy identification of dangerous offenders, the production of credible evidence in court, or the unequivocal identification of victims. This prepares participants for the following work.(2) Identifying issues in the use of medical data in security contexts: Seminars will explore the actual and potential issues that arise when medical data become available to security efforts via the use of novel forensic genetic technologies. Forensic uses of DNA have so far consisted of matching samples from crime scenes, unidentified persons, or volunteers, with existing DNA profiles (e.g. on a DNA database). Novel technologies are anticipated to provide much more information about the donor of a sample, for example their appearance, age, even behaviour. This can impact on the way society understands and treats health data, especially when information is vital in the face of serious criminal, terrorist or mass disaster threats. Seminars will also explore how such novel technologies have already been used, and compare the legal and ethical contexts of their application.(3) Comparing uses of forensic genetic technologies across countries: DNA technologies and data are increasingly used across national borders. National variation in criminal laws, privacy legislation and police practices render this process very complex. For example, there are differences in who can be asked to give a DNA sample by police forces. Seminars will, by inviting leading scholars from Europe and the USA, compare practices and public and professional debates across a variety of jurisdictions. The development of good practice in the UK can be informed by learning from experience elsewhere, and expectations and misunderstandings in the cross-border use of these technologies can be addressed.The seminars will bring together academic researchers, policy makers and practitioners from policing organisations, commercial forensic service providers, public sector organisations and civil society groups, in the UK and abroad, to discuss how such technologies can be used to support security while respecting freedom. A network of those involved will be established to disseminate existing and to design new research to inform UK policy and practice on the uses of genetic information to address the societal challenges of justice and security.
期刊论文(8)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
DOI: 10.1515/jwiet-2019-0006
发表时间: 2019
期刊: Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik
影响因子: --
作者: [Lipphardt V]
通讯作者: Lipphardt V
Approaching ethical, legal and social issues of emerging forensic DNA phenotyping (FDP) technologies comprehensively: Reply to 'Forensic DNA phenotyping: Predicting human appearance from crime scene material for investigative purposes' by Manfred Kayser
全面处理新兴法医 DNA 表型分析 (FDP) 技术的伦理、法律和社会问题:回复 Manfred Kayser 的“法医 DNA 表型分析:从犯罪现场材料中预测人类外观以用于调查目的”
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.01.010
发表时间: 2016
期刊: Genetics
影响因子: 3.3
作者: [Toom V]
通讯作者: Toom V
DOI: 10.1080/14636778.2018.1469975
发表时间: 2018
期刊: New Genetics and Society
影响因子: 1.8
作者: [Wienroth M]
通讯作者: Wienroth M
Socio-technical disagreements as ethical fora: Parabon NanoLab's forensic DNA Snapshot™ service at the intersection of discourses around robust science, technology validation, and commerce
作为道德论坛的社会技术分歧:Parabon NanoLab 的法医 DNA 快照™ 服务处于围绕强大科学、技术验证和商业的讨论的交叉点
DOI: 10.1057/s41292-018-0138-8
发表时间: 2018
期刊: BioSocieties
影响因子: 1.6
作者: [Wienroth M]
通讯作者: Wienroth M
共 7 条
    Developing a non-animal model system to investigate bitter tastants as new treatments for asthma
    • 批准号:
      NC/M001504/1
    • 项目类别:
      Research Grant
    • 资助金额:
      $12.6万
    • 财政年份:
      2015
    • 负责人:
      Robin Williams
    • 依托单位:
    Replacing, Refining, and Reducing Animal Usage in Epilepsy Research Using a Non-Sentient Model
    • 批准号:
      G0900775/1
    • 项目类别:
      Research Grant
    • 资助金额:
      $52.93万
    • 财政年份:
      2010
    • 负责人:
      Robin Williams
    • 依托单位:
    Doctoral Dissertation Research in Sociology
    • 批准号:
      7714986
    • 项目类别:
      Standard Grant
    • 资助金额:
      $0.0万
    • 财政年份:
      1978
    • 负责人:
      Robin Williams
    • 依托单位:
    国内基金
    海外基金
    删失数据非线性分位数回归模型的series估计及其实证分析中的应用
    • 批准号:
    • 项目类别:
      省市级项目
    • 资助金额:
      10.0万元
    • 批准年份:
      2022
    • 负责人:
      王曦
    • 依托单位:
    基于线性及非线性模型的高维金融时间序列建模:理论及应用
    • 批准号:
      71771224
    • 项目类别:
      面上项目
    • 资助金额:
      49.0万元
    • 批准年份:
      2017
    • 负责人:
      王辉
    • 依托单位: