Local Acc Fund 21 Children, Learning and Inclusive Places (CLIP)

格拉斯哥大学(UOG)和贝尔法斯特女王大学(QUB)是机构战略的早期采纳者，通过苏格兰儿童邻里关系(CNS)和女王社区和地方(QCAP)，以研究为导向的社区参与侧重于应对持久的经济和社会挑战。我们一直在格拉斯哥的特定社区和其他贫困高度集中的地区单独开展工作，贝尔法斯特在过去12个月里制定了关于儿童和环境的试点方案。这一工作方案，儿童学习和包容性场所(CLIP)的目的是反思我们在基于场所的联合制作方面的经验，以便加强我们与我们目前和未来社区合作伙伴的研究和开发工作，并对其产生影响。虽然我们在不同领域分别开展了工作，但我们都对“能力”以及参与性研究提供的干预措施如何能够在最贫困的社区中建立更具包容性和本地化的战略表示关注。大学间申请的价值在于：它汇集了不同的学术专业；不同的政策、制度和监管制度；一系列共同设计方法和影响战略；以及植根于特定地方和生活在那里的儿童的日常经验。这一工作方案将：思考社区联合制作与循证政策对我们整个案例社区的影响之间的联系；找出有效影响方面的障碍和潜力；建立和测试有效的做法以支持参与性研究；并帮助指导我们计划的关于儿童、场所和环境的研究。简而言之，我们认为这一伙伴关系有助于最大限度地扩大我们工作方案的影响；同时，在我们对环境、地方和儿童生活的共同关注中，产生上游的影响。国家科学中心与社会和教育公平网络(NSEE)在智利有一个研究实践伙伴关系，利用国家科学中心开发的能力办法扩大儿童及其机构在气候变化讨论中的声音。这表明他们在环境问题上的呼声很少，但也表明儿童和年轻人的反应是积极和清晰的。同样，QUB在贝尔法斯特市场地区进行的社区调查强调，污染、汽车拥堵和停车以及未充分利用废弃场地是当地重建的关键优先事项之一。通过评估我们与儿童和场所的工作，我们的目标是将联合制作置于研究影响辩论的核心，并在这项提案中反映我们的目标是检验我们关于儿童、场所和环境之间关系的概念和想法。

The University of Glasgow (UOG) and Queen's University Belfast (QUB) have been early adopters of institutional strategies for research-led community engagement focused on addressing enduring economic and social challenges, through Children's Neighbourhood Scotland (CNS) and Queen's Communities and Place (QCAP). We have been working separately in specific communities in Glasgow, and other areas with high concentrations of poverty, and Belfast and over the last 12 months have developed pilot place-based programmes on children and the environment. The aim of this programme of work, Children Learning and Inclusive Places (CLIP) is to reflect on our experience of place-based co-production in order to both strengthen and build impact into our research and developmental work with our current and with future community partners. Whilst we have worked separately in different areas, we share a conceptual concern for 'capabilities' and how interventions, informed by participatory research, can build more inclusive and locally owned strategies in even the most deprived communities. The value of the inter-university application is that: it brings together separate academic specialisms; different policy, institutional and regulatory regimes; a range of co-design methodologies and impact strategies; and rootedness in the everyday experiences of specific places and the children who live there. This programme of work will: reflect on the connection between community co-production and evidence-based policy impact across our case communities; identify barriers and potential in effective impact; build and test effective practices to support participatory research; and help direct our planned research on children, place and the environment. In short, we see this partnership helping to maximise the impact of our programmes of work; and at the same time build impact, upstream, into our shared concern for environment, place and children's lives. CNS and the Network for Social and Educational Equity (NSEE) have a Research Practice Partnership Chile in using the capabilities approach developed by CNS to amplify children's voices and their agency in the climate change discussion. This showed how underrepresented their voice is on the environment but also the engaged and articulated nature of the responses across children and young people. Similarly, the community survey in the Market area of Belfast, carried out by QUB, highlighted pollution, car congestion and parking and the under use of derelict sites as one of their key priorities in local regeneration. By evaluating our work with children and place we aim to put co-production at the heart of the research impact debate and, as well as reflecting we aim in this proposal to test out our concepts and ideas on this relationship between children, place and the environment.