Novel Cardiac MRI techniques for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease compared to PET imaging and Invasive Coronary Angiography.
Novel Cardiac MRI techniques for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease compared to PET imaging and Invasive Coronary Angiography.
批准号:
MR/P01979X/1
负责人:
Muhummad Sohaib Nazir
金额:
$27.44万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Fellowship
财政年份:
2017
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2017 至 --
中文摘要
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the second most common cause of death in the UK and it is very important to identify patients who have CAD early so that prevention can be started before a heart attack occurs. A wide range of tests are used to detect CAD. Coronary angiography is routinely used in the NHS, and without extra flow measurements, we do not know how important CAD is. Heart scans can be used to detect important CAD including a scan that uses radioactive dye, ultrasound or cardiac MRI (CMR) which are interpreted by simply looking at images on a computer console. This visual interpretation is generally accurate but even with well trained individuals, scan reporters can differ in their interpretation especially in cases where there is such widespread CAD that the test may be appear normal. We can measure the heart's blood flow with heart scans and the best method to do this is with Positron Emission Tomography (PET). This is better than visual inspection in identifying heart disease, can help with predicting the risk of a heart attack and other health hazards and help doctors decide which patients to treat with heart surgery. Unfortunately PET scanning is expensive (over £2,000 per scan), not available widely and uses potential harmful ionising radiation.CMR can be used to measure the heart's blood flow. It has a major advantage over PET because it is much cheaper (around £500), more widely available and is safer as no harmful radiation is used. In previous research studies (the largest one performed at King's College London), blood flow measurements with PET and CMR were compared and found to be similar but not to agree perfectly. This study had some important limitations, as patients were scanned using separate CMR and PET scanners, on different days and separate analysis. Therefore, there has yet to be a conclusive comparison of PET and CMR blood flow measurements.ADVANCES IN TECHNOLOGY- We are privileged to have a 'hybrid PET-MR scanner', only the second one in the UK, which is able to perform PET and CMR scans at the same time. This scanner allows us to perform heart blood flow measurements at exactly the same time with PET and CMR and therefore allows a true head on comparison of the tests. This will help us to determine with more certainty if CMR is as good as PET for measuring the heart's blood flow. - We have developed a new method to measure the heart's blood flow which is very accurate in animal and flow model studies but we need to test this in humans.- Measuring blood flow is cumbersome and time-consuming with CMR and can take several hours even for an expert. We have developed an automated software to perform this which may be used for routine clinical diagnosis at point of care in the NHS.AIMI aim to test if CMR can be a cheaper, more widely available and safer alternative to PET. If proven to be comparable, automated CMR tools can be readily translated to clinical practice across the UK to enhance diagnosis of CAD. I will compare blood flow measured with PET and CMR using a novel hybrid PET-MR scanner and novel CMR techniques in patients with heart disease. We will compare blood flow measurements with novel CMR with findings with coronary angiography. METHODS-10 healthy volunteers without heart disease will undergo a PET-MR scan to measure blood flow with PET and CMR at the same time. This will allow us to test the method in humans.-77 patients who are scheduled for an angiogram will have a PET-MR scan of their heart . We will compare blood flow measurements with CMR, PET and presence of CAD with coronary angiography.We hope to get a better understanding of the heart's blood flow and test if this CMR tool is as good as PET and angiography. This will be helpful to patients as CMR is safe, non-invasive and does not use radiation. This tool may help doctors treat patients better by guiding doctors on which patients needs medications, stents or heart surgery.
期刊论文(10)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314557
发表时间:
2019-09
期刊:
Heart (British Cardiac Society)
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Nazir MS, Nicol ED]
通讯作者:
Nicol ED
Impact of Temporal Resolution and Methods for Correction on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Quantification.
时间分辨率和校正方法对心脏磁共振灌注定量的影响。
DOI:
10.1002/jmri.28180
发表时间:
2022-12
期刊:
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
[Milidonis, Xenios, Nazir, Muhummad Sohaib, Chiribiri, Amedeo]
通讯作者:
Chiribiri, Amedeo
Pulmonary arteriovenous malformations and embolic myocardial infarction identified with cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
心血管磁共振识别肺动静脉畸形和栓塞性心肌梗死。
DOI:
10.1093/ehjci/jez169
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Nazir MS]
通讯作者:
Nazir MS
DOI:
10.1002/mrm.28296
发表时间:
2020-11
期刊:
Magnetic resonance in medicine
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
[Milidonis X, Nazir MS, Schneider T, Capstick M, Drost S, Kok G, Pelevic N, Poelma C, Schaeffter T, Chiribiri A]
通讯作者:
Chiribiri A
The SCOT-HEART trial: cardiac CT to guide patient management and improve outcomes.
SCOT-HEART 试验:心脏 CT 指导患者管理并改善结果。
DOI:
10.1093/cvr/cvz173
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
Cardiovascular research
影响因子:
10.8
作者:
[Nazir MS]
通讯作者:
Nazir MS
海外基金