Reporting of randomised trials using surrogate outcomes: development of extensions to the CONSORT 2010 and SPIRIT 2013 guidance statements
Reporting of randomised trials using surrogate outcomes: development of extensions to the CONSORT 2010 and SPIRIT 2013 guidance statements
批准号:
MR/V038400/1
负责人:
Rod Taylor
金额:
$12.17万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Research Grant
财政年份:
2022
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2022 至 --
中文摘要
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
OUR AIM: To improve the accuracy and reporting of surrogate outcomes in randomised trials through the development of an extension to current reporting checklists.WHY THIS RESEARCH IS IMPORTANT: Evidence for the effectiveness of treatments ideally comes from well-designed randomised controlled trials that assess patient-centred outcomes that directly measures how a patient feels, functions, or survives. Widely adopted and evidence-based, SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) and CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statements provide minimum recommendations for reporting protocols and results of randomised trials. In drive to make treatments available more quickly to patients, surrogate endpoints are increasing used as the main outcomes in randomised trials. A surrogate endpoint becomes a 'substitute' for patient centred outcomes, e.g. a trial of a new drug for particular type of life-limiting cancer ultimately seeking to improve patient survival, will assess tumour size within the clinical trial instead of death (that would take much longer to occur). Advantages of trials based on a surrogate endpoint is that they are shorter, smaller, and less expensive. However, an important potential down-side of such trials is that the therapy may turn out not to have the benefit predicted by a surrogate, e.g. the drug is licensed and made available based to patients based on evidence of a reduction in tumour size (compared to placebo) but turns out not to improve (or even worsen) patient mortality. It is therefore recommended that trials using surrogate endpoints only use endpoints that have been proven ('validated') to predict patient centred outcomes. However, this infrequently seems to happen in practice leading to potential misleading conclusions drawn from published studies. Therefore, better reporting is needed. Improving the reporting of trials with surrogate endpoints as its outcome will add value to the existing extensions to SPIRIT and CONSORT Standards. WHAT WE PLAN TO DO: We will adopt similar methods as used previously to develop SPIRIT and CONSORT main statements and extensions. We have already conducted a scoping review of the literature that we will use to draw up a long list of items that we consider may be useful in reporting surrogate endpoints trials. We will then conduct a Delphi, a quantitative method aimed at generating consensus comprising (1) an online survey, and (2) a virtual consensus meeting. For the online survey, we will contact stakeholders including clinical trials researchers with experience in the design/conduct/analysis/reporting of surrogate endpoints trials, knowledge users, representatives from funding bodies, journal editors, and patient and public involvement representatives. We will identify individuals from relevant publications and through our extensive research networks. The final phase of the study involves writing and disseminating SPIRIT and CONSORT extension guidance and checklists, and an 'Explanation and Elaboration' document that provides a more detailed guide of how to use the checklists, and examples of protocol and trial reporting good practice. One of the study group who has extensive experience in acting as lay contributor to trial methodological research has been involved in writing of this application and will help us ensure public involvement in our study, if funded. BENEFITS OF THE STUDY: CONSORT and SPIRIT extensions for surrogate primary endpoints will aid in critical appraisal and interpretation for grant reviewers, funding bodies, trial methodologists, journal editors, reviewers, and readers (including patients and members of the public). The outputs of this research are expected to reduce incomplete, unclear, or inaccurate reporting of protocols and trials assessing surrogate endpoints thus limiting erroneous conclusions about the long-term safety and efficacy of treatments.
期刊论文(10)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1002/trc2.12340
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA-TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH & CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
[Manyara, Anthony Muchai, Ciani, Oriana, Taylor, Rod S]
通讯作者:
Taylor, Rod S
DOI:
10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102283
发表时间:
2023-11
期刊:
ECLINICALMEDICINE
影响因子:
15.1
作者:
[Ciani, Oriana, Manyara, Anthony M., Davies, Philippa, Stewart, Derek, Weir, Christopher J., Young, Amber E., Blazeby, Jane, Butcher, Nancy J., Bujkiewicz, Sylwia, Chan, An-Wen, Dawoud, Dalia, Offringa, Martin, Ouwens, Mario, Hrobjartssson, Asbjorn, Amstutz, Alain, Bertolaccini, Luca, Bruno, Vito Domenico, Devane, Declan, Faria, Christina D. C. M., Gilbert, Peter B., Harris, Ray, Lassere, Marissa, Marinelli, Lucio, Markham, Sarah, Powers, John H., Rezaei, Yousef, Richert, Laura, Schwendicke, Falk, Tereshchenko, Larisa G., Thoma, Achilles, Turan, Alparslan, Worrall, Andrew, Christensen, Robin, Collins, Gary S., Ross, Joseph S., Taylor, Rod S.]
通讯作者:
Taylor, Rod S.
DOI:
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062798
发表时间:
2022-10-13
期刊:
BMJ open
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
[]
通讯作者:
DOI:
10.1136/jech-2022-219294
发表时间:
2022-06-24
期刊:
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
影响因子:
6.3
作者:
[Ciani, Oriana, Manyara, Anthony, Taylor, Rod S.]
通讯作者:
Taylor, Rod S.
DOI:
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064304
发表时间:
2022-10-11
期刊:
BMJ open
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
[]
通讯作者:
共 7 条
海外基金