Principles for research on ethnicity in palliative and end of life care: development of a consensus statement

姑息治疗和临终关怀中的种族研究原则：制定共识声明

• 批准号: MR/X011275/1
• 负责人: Jonathan Koffman
• 金额: $ 6.02万
• 依托单位: University of Hull
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Research Grant
• 财政年份: 2023
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2023 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=MR%2FX011275%2F1
• 关键词: Principles; research; ethnicity; palliative; end

Each year 600,000 UK people die. This number will continue to grow. Many people living in the UK come from ethnically diverse communities. By 2051, nearly 40 million will be aged 65 years and over. Many will experience illnesses that lead to death. Palliative care improves the experiences and outcomes of care for people with life-limiting illnesses and their families. Research that has explored the relationship between ethnicity and palliative care has shown care is often not provided fairly, meaning patients from ethnically diverse groups and their families have poor experiences and outcomes of care. Researchers have often used different methods when exploring these issues so the findings are not easy to compare; the research questions asked have not always reflected what people from ethnically diverse communities want and the findings from the research have not been written clearly or with respect. We aim to produce guidance for researchers on how methods can be improved to understand the relationship between ethnicity and palliative care in the UK. This way we can reduce inequalities and improve experiences and outcomes of palliative care.One way of doing this is a Delphi study where researchers find people who are experts in the field of interest to work out where they agree or disagree about important issues. With this information, we can reach a consensus. We will seek out people from ethnically diverse communities living in the UK, expert researchers who have done work in the field before, and health professionals who care for patients from ethnically diverse communities and charities e.g. Marie Curie and Macmillan Cancer Support among others. In Phase 1 of the Delphi study, we will use open-ended questions to obtain these expert participants' opinions on how research questions should be developed, the methods needed to answer questions and how research findings should be reported. We will examine all their answers. In Phase 2 we will send a list of all the issues from Phase 1 and ask the experts to score each one from 0=not important to 5=very important. If in their opinion there are still issues missing from the list, they will be encouraged to add to it. Each expert will then send back their scores to us. We will then summarise participants' views as a whole. In Phase 3 we will then send the summary back to the participants. At this stage, they will be given a reminder of how they scored items before and the range of scores of the group. Using this information each participant will then be asked to think carefully about their scores. They can decide if they want to stick with their score or change it. Throughout the whole process, no one will have to change their score if they do not want to. We will then organise all the scores from Phase 3 so we can arrive at a point of 'consensus'. We will also be able to see if views about methods used when exploring ethnicity and palliative care are different by professional group or across ethnic groups. We will invite all participants to a meeting where we will discuss the results of the Delphi and the best methods when researching ethnicity and palliative care and how to report findings. The discussion from the meeting and the results of the Delphi will lead to guidance on the methods needed to undertake better research in future. We are a multi-ethnic, multi-professional group of researchers and health and social care professionals including two patient and public involvement experts from ethnically diverse communities who will be involved in all stages of this important study. We will offer full training and support to them as necessary. We will share what we find in a journal called Palliative Medicine. This is the leading journal for researchers and health and social care professionals who care for patients and their families. We will also share what we find at the European Association of Palliative Care.

每年有60万英国人死亡。这个数字将继续增长。生活在英国的许多人来自不同种族的社区。到2051年，将有近4 000万人年龄在65岁以上。许多人会经历导致死亡的疾病。姑息治疗改善了患有限制生命的疾病的人及其家人的护理经验和结果。探索种族和姑息治疗之间关系的研究表明，护理往往不公平，这意味着来自不同种族群体的患者及其家人的护理经验和结果都很差。研究人员在探索这些问题时经常使用不同的方法，因此研究结果不容易比较;提出的研究问题并不总是反映来自不同种族社区的人们想要什么，研究结果也没有明确或尊重地写出来。我们的目标是为研究人员提供指导，指导他们如何改进方法，以了解英国种族和姑息治疗之间的关系。通过这种方式，我们可以减少不平等，改善姑息治疗的体验和结果。其中一种方法是德尔菲研究，研究人员找到感兴趣领域的专家，找出他们在重要问题上的一致或不一致之处。有了这些信息，我们就能达成共识。我们将寻找来自英国不同种族社区的人，以前在该领域工作过的专家研究人员，以及照顾来自不同种族社区和慈善机构（如玛丽居里和麦克米伦癌症支持等）的患者的卫生专业人员。在德尔菲研究的第一阶段，我们将使用开放式问题来获得这些专家参与者关于如何开发研究问题的意见，回答问题所需的方法以及如何报告研究结果。我们将检查他们的所有答案。在第二阶段，我们将发送第一阶段的所有问题的列表，并要求专家对每个问题进行评分，从0=不重要到5=非常重要。如果他们认为列表中还有遗漏的问题，我们将鼓励他们添加到列表中。然后，每位专家将把他们的分数发送给我们。然后，我们将总结与会者的整体观点。在第三阶段，我们将把总结发送给参与者。在这一阶段，他们将得到一个提醒，他们如何得分项目之前和组的分数范围。使用这些信息，每个参与者将被要求仔细考虑他们的分数。他们可以决定是否要坚持自己的分数或改变它。在整个过程中，没有人会有改变他们的分数，如果他们不想。然后，我们将组织第三阶段的所有分数，以便我们能够达成“共识”。我们还将能够看到，如果在探索种族和姑息治疗时使用的方法的观点是不同的专业群体或跨种族群体。我们将邀请所有参与者参加一个会议，在那里我们将讨论德尔菲的结果和研究种族和姑息治疗时的最佳方法，以及如何报告结果。会议的讨论和德尔菲的结果将为今后开展更好的研究所需的方法提供指导。我们是一个多种族，多专业的研究人员和健康和社会护理专业人员，包括两名来自不同种族社区的患者和公众参与专家，他们将参与这项重要研究的所有阶段。我们将在必要时为他们提供全面的培训和支持。我们将在《姑息医学》杂志上分享我们的发现。这是研究人员和卫生和社会护理专业人员谁照顾病人及其家属的领先杂志。我们还将分享我们在欧洲姑息治疗协会的发现。