课题基金 / 基金详情

Contested Urban Street Space - Exploring the relationships between road user behaviour, walking and cycling infrastructure, and highway regulations

Contested Urban Street Space - Exploring the relationships between road user behaviour, walking and cycling infrastructure, and highway regulations
有争议的城市街道空间 - 探索道路使用者行为、步行和自行车基础设施以及高速公路法规之间的关系
批准号:
1938130
负责人:
金额:
$0.0万
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Studentship
财政年份:
2017
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2017 至 --

项目摘要

项目成果

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
The future of sustainable transport relies on an understanding of behaviour in relation to interactions within the transport environment and the choice of means of transport. Social behaviours within the public realm are influenced by the law and regulation, and by the design of the environment (such as the degree of mixing or segregation of different user types). The most likely theory to be useful to assist in researching behaviour within the legal and environmental context is Behaviourism (Watson, 1930), a theory of learning that assumes behaviours are acquired through conditioning, and which result from interactions with the environment.The research will hypothesise a model of the relations between design, regulation and behaviour which may be used to illuminate further understanding about appropriate future direction in design and regulation with the aim of developing more sustainable transport futures. The aim of the research is to investigate the behaviour of all road users navigating within or adjacent to walking and cycling infrastructure in the context of the regulations that shape its use.The aim is supported by the following provisional research questions:1. How does:a. behaviour influence infrastructure design and regulation?b. regulation influence infrastructure design and behaviour? c. infrastructure design influence regulation and behaviour? 2. What effect are new and emerging standards, guidance and regulation having on design?3. What law and regulation still constrains scheme designs?4. What are the attitude and approach of the police and legal profession to walking and cycle traffic?5. What processes can be adopted to trial innovative walking and cycle traffic schemes?6. What is the nature of public discourse relating to pedestrian and cycle traffic schemes?7. What can be learnt from the experience in other North European contexts?The provisional proposed research methods include the following:- Focus groups among homogeneous and heterogeneous groups of road users (RQ1)- Semi-structured interviews with different groups of road users (RQ1)- Key informant interviews with professionals in the UK, including designers, planners, the police, insurers and policy makers (RQs 2 to 5)- Collation and analysis of design guidance and documents relating to highway and traffic law and regulation (RQs 2 to 5)- Collation and analysis of media reporting on the public discourse relating to pedestrian and cycle traffic schemes (RQ 6)- Reference interviews to learn from other North European contexts (RQ 7)The research has significant potential to inform future highway regulation and infrastructure design, particularly for cycling and walking. By exploring the behaviours of road users as they respond to infrastructure design, regulation and other road users, the research may also be informative for future developments of the Highway Code, and driver and cycle training. Dissemination would take place through professional and other networks of which UWE is a member.ProgrammeYear 1: review literature, establish theoretical basis, develop the methodology, obtain ethics approvalYear 2: further develop and pilot the methodology, start data collectionYear 3: complete data collection, analyse the data, write up
期刊论文(1)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.01.005
发表时间: 2019
期刊: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
影响因子: --
作者: [Flower J]
通讯作者: Flower J
海外基金