REDD+ as an area-based policy: evidence from the 2011 Moratorium on oil palm, timber and logging concessions in Indonesia

REDD 作为一项区域性政策：来自 2011 年印度尼西亚暂停油棕、木材和伐木特许权的证据

• 批准号: 2098317
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: London School of Economics and Political Science
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2018
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2018 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2098317
• 关键词: REDD+; area; based; policy; evidence

The 2011 Moratorium on new oil palm, timber and logging concessionsin primary forests and peatlands is an area-based policy, which wasimplemented in Indonesia to scale up efforts to reduce emissions fromdeforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). Using quasiexperimentalmethods and satellite fire observations, this paperevaluates the extent to which the policy was effective in preventing theoccurrence of fire, typically used to clear forests in preparation for newconcessions. We find that the effect of the Moratorium is negligiblewhen considering global changes in fire regimes from 2006-2011 to2011-2016. Pre-existing concessions for oil palm and timberconcessions perform significantly worse than areas included in theMoratorium. Conversely, logging concessions perform significantlybetter. While a potential claim for the inclusion of logged andsecondary forests in the Moratorium area is valid, we argue thatpolitical factors have to be considered when designing conservation policy in Indonesia

2011年暂停在原始森林和泥炭地新的油棕榈、木材和伐木特许权是一项基于地区的政策，印度尼西亚实施这项政策是为了加大努力减少毁林和森林退化所致排放量（REDD+）。使用准实验方法和卫星火灾观测，本文评估了该政策在防止火灾发生方面的有效程度，通常用于清除森林，为新的特许权做准备。我们发现，当考虑到2006-2011年到2011 -2016年全球火灾状况的变化时，暂停的影响可以忽略不计。先前存在的油棕和木材特许经营区的表现比暂停措施所包括的地区差得多。相反，伐木特许经营的表现要好得多。虽然一个潜在的要求，包括砍伐和次生林在暂停地区是有效的，我们认为，政治因素必须考虑时，设计保护政策，在印度尼西亚