Critical Freedom: Between Lacan and Deleuze and Guattari

批判的自由：拉康、德勒兹和瓜塔里之间

• 批准号: 2100879
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Royal Holloway University of London
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2018
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2018 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2100879
• 关键词: Critical; Freedom; Between; Lacan; Deleuze

Mainstream political philosophy customarily understands freedom as the capacity of a subject with a determinate identity to pursue its interests. Recent theories of the subject have in turn undermined the agency of the subject by pointing to the ways in which the subject itself is subjected to power, the body and genetics and consequently not in control of its own agential capacity. By these accounts, the subject either possesses transparent and conscious agency or is determined by the structures that produce it. Theories of freedom are therefore left to choose between a voluntarist or determinist concept of the subject. My research will use the work of Jacques Lacan, Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari in order to elaborate a notion of 'critical freedom' that is able to advance discussions of freedom beyond this impasse. In doing so, it will not only produce a novel reading of the relationship between the agency of the subject and the structures that produce it, but will also revise the long-held view that Deleuze and Guattari's thought is fundamentally incompatible with Lacan's. This redresses an absence of serious consideration of how Deleuze, Guattari and Lacan can be aligned, and brings to light some of the most interesting and important but overlooked aspects of their exchanges. The concept of freedom this project develops will also be brought into conversation with liberal, Marxist, and anarchist notions of freedom to show how it can enhance more recent ideas offered by what has become known as 'post-anarchist' theory. This will make clear how post-anarchist theory can utilize poststructuralist resources more fully to advance its own conception of politics and the political.

主流政治哲学通常将自由理解为具有确定身份的主体追求其利益的能力。最近的主体理论反过来又破坏了主体的代理能力，因为主体本身受到权力、身体和遗传的影响，因此无法控制自己的代理能力。根据这些说法，主体要么拥有透明且有意识的能动性，要么由产生它的结构决定。因此，自由理论只能在唯意志论或决定论的主体概念之间做出选择。我的研究将利用雅克·拉康、吉尔·德勒兹和菲利克斯·瓜塔里的著作来阐述“批判自由”的概念，从而推动关于自由的讨论超越这一僵局。这样做不仅会对主体的能动性与产生主体的结构之间的关系产生一种新颖的解读，而且还将修正长期以来认为德勒兹和加塔里的思想与拉康的思想根本不相容的观点。这纠正了对德勒兹、瓜塔里和拉康如何协调一致的认真考虑，并揭示了他们的交流中一些最有趣、最重要但被忽视的方面。该项目所发展的自由概念也将与自由主义、马克思主义和无政府主义的自由概念进行对话，以表明它如何能够增强所谓的“后无政府主义”理论所提供的最新思想。这将阐明后无政府主义理论如何更充分地利用后结构主义资源来推进其自身的政治和政治概念。