From Regeneration to Repair: Exploring Alternative Directions for Urban Development in Twenty-First Century London

从再生到修复：探索二十一世纪伦敦城市发展的替代方向

• 批准号: 2243529
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: University College London
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2019
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2019 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2243529
• 关键词: Regeneration; Repair; Exploring; Alternative; Directions

A city of intense and intensifying inequalities, urban development in London is increasingly defined by displacement and displaceability. Although predominantly read through the prism of housing, this trend also envelops the economic, social, cultural and community infrastructures which comprise the city's diverse popular neighbourhoods. Within this story, regeneration planning not only has a hand in shaping the construction of displaceable subjects in the city, it has also emerged as a locus of struggle and contestation for alternative regeneration futures. Zooming in on the London Borough of Southwark (LBS), this thesis will explore how displacement and displaceability is being constructed and contested in local regeneration planning. Picking up and amplifying calls for alternative ways of knowing (and thus acting in) the city. At a time when municipalism is once again emerging as a 'cipher of hope' for urban justice movements the world over, maintaining critical attention on the agency of municipal planners in the making (and unmaking) of displaceability in the modern city is essential to keeping the idea of planning in play as a (re)claimable force for change. Although grounded in the situated reality of one inner-London borough, the experience of Southwark will be connected to locally and globally resonant conversations about who and what the city is for and, within this, how and under what conditions regeneration planning might be (re)claimed as a lever for progressive change. Drawing inspiration from ideas and emphases more commonly associated with the so-called southern turn in planning theory and practice, this thesis seeks to switch the debate from regeneration to repair exploring this as a propositional alternative to dominant and displacing urban development approaches in the capital.The central research question for the project is: How is displacement and displaceability constructed and contested in contemporary regeneration planning?

伦敦是一个不平等现象日益严重的城市，其城市发展越来越多地被流离失所和可持续性所定义。虽然主要是通过住房的棱镜来阅读，但这一趋势也影响了构成该市各种流行街区的经济、社会、文化和社区基础设施。在这个故事中，再生规划不仅在塑造城市中可替代主体的建设方面发挥了作用，而且还成为了替代再生未来的斗争和挑战的场所。本文以伦敦萨瑟克自治市为例，探讨在当地的重建规划中，置换和可替代性是如何被构建和争议的。接受并扩大对了解（从而采取行动）城市的替代方式的呼吁。在一个时间，当唯物主义再次出现作为一个“希望的密码”的城市正义运动在世界各地，保持批判性的关注机构的市政规划师在制作（和unmaking）的可持续性在现代城市是必不可少的，以保持在发挥规划的想法作为一个（重新）索赔的力量变化。虽然立足于伦敦市中心的现实，但萨瑟克的经历将与当地和全球的共鸣对话联系起来，讨论城市是谁和什么，以及在此范围内，如何以及在什么条件下再生规划可能被（重新）声称为渐进式变革的杠杆。借鉴的想法和重点，更普遍地与所谓的南转规划理论和实践的启发，本文旨在切换辩论从再生修复探索这作为一个命题替代占主导地位的和取代城市发展的方法在capital.The中心的研究问题的项目是：如何位移和可移植性建设和当代再生规划的争议？