课题基金 / 基金详情

Evaluating the Legacy of the World War One Centenary in British Tourist Experiences at the Western Front

Evaluating the Legacy of the World War One Centenary in British Tourist Experiences at the Western Front
评估一战一百周年的英国西线旅游体验的遗产
批准号:
2270568
负责人:
金额:
$0.0万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Studentship
财政年份:
2019
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2019 至 --

项目摘要

项目成果

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
The primary aim of this project is to evaluate how the Centenary celebrations for the First World War have impacted on British tourists consumption of items of heritage on the Western Front, and more specifically in the area of Ieper, Belgium. Ieper (Ypres) is a historical centre for British tourists due to the locality of major items of remembrance such as the Menin Gate memorial and Tyne Cot Cemetery, the largest British First World War Cemetery, as it is the site for the infamous Battle of Passchendaele (Third Battle of Ypres). The Centenary celebrations have propelled the First World War to a new status in the public consciousness. Tourist numbers to this area have been steadily rising before the Centenary, however, as the temporal distance to the conflict grows some fear that the emotional connection is fading and it is becoming merely a tourist attraction, and not a place of remembrance and education.There is extensive research on how visitors have come to interact with items of heritage on the Western Front, most of which comment on the importance, or question the impact of the Centenary celebrations and this study aims to answer those questions. Undoubtedly more visitation will result from the four year event, however the important questions are: Have the nature of visitors experiences changed and what has caused this change? Are these changes limited to certain groups, e.g. age? Do Sites of Memory experience changes in the same manner as other items of heritage that may be educationally focused?The study will look to further explore the relationship of Sites of Memory as items of heritage to other heritage sites that are perhaps lean towards education rather than remembrance. As the temporal distance to the conflict grows are the divisions between these sites deteriorating as they come to fulfill a similar purpose? Or are they being driven apart in an attempt to maintain the emotional resonance of Sites of Memory? Has the influx of attention brought to these sites by the centenary accelerated previous trends or has it spawned new changes?
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
海外基金