A Critique of Ethical Approaches to Conflict

价值冲突是现代政治中不可避免的一部分。在面对它们时，我们应该以共识或妥协为目标，还是两者都不要？支撑我的研究项目的诊断是，无论是冲突解决方法还是冲突遏制方法都不能对这个问题提供令人满意的答案。这样做的原因是，这两种方法都不是基于现象学的分析，这种分析揭示了我们实际处理的不同价值冲突的范围；相反，每种方法(错误地)都规定所有的价值冲突都适合一种特定的模式。为了说明这一点，我想对现实世界中的价值冲突实例进行现象学分析。我的主张是，只有在对不同类型的价值冲突以及参与其中的人如何经历这些价值冲突的深入了解的基础上，我们才能对上述问题产生合理的答案。五.工作月0-6的时间表：研究和写作(A)CC和CR简介；(B)批判性文献回顾；和(C)经修订的项目大纲7-15：从棘手的价值冲突开始，对冲突类型进行现象学分析，转向更易管理的价值冲突；16-18：完成现象学部分；19-24：将现象学分析应用于冲突战略；25-27：完成应用；28-30：完成最后一章和全文草稿30-36：修订全文草稿和呈件

Conflicts over values are an inevitable part of modern polities. Should we aim at consensus or compromise or neither when confronted with them? The diagnosis underpinning my research project is that neither Conflict Resolution nor Conflict Containment approaches provide satisfactory answers to this question. The reason for this is that both approaches are not based on a phenomenological analysis that brings out the range of different value conflicts we are actually dealing with; instead, each approach (wrongly) stipulates that all value conflicts fit a particular mold. In order to show this, I want to provide a phenomenological analysis of real-world instances of value conflicts. My claim is that only on the basis of such deeper understanding of the different kinds of value conflicts and how they are experienced by those involved in them, we can generate sound answers to the question raised above.V. Schedule of WorkMonths 0 - 6: Research and writing (a) Introduction to CC and CR; (b) Critical literature review; and (c) revised Project Outline7 - 15: Phenomenological analysis of conflict types, starting from intractable value conflicts moving towards more manageable value conflicts16 - 18: Completion of the phenomenology section19 - 24: Application of phenomenological analysis to strategies to conflict25 - 27: Completion of the application section28 - 30: Completion of a concluding chapter and a full draft30 - 36: Revising the full draft and submission