The Reception of Troubadour Poetry in 16th-Century Italy: from The Questione della Lingua to Giammaria Barbieri's Arte del Rimare

16世纪意大利游吟诗人诗歌的接受：从《语言问题》到贾马里亚·巴比耶里的《利玛尔艺术》

• 批准号: 2435529
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: University of Oxford
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2020
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2020 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2435529
• 关键词: Reception; Troubadour; Poetry; 16th; Century

The lyric poetry produced by the Occitan troubadours between the 12th and 13th centuries is at the root of the European poetic tradition. Despite its importance, it was mostly disregarded throughout Europe between the late 14th and 15th century. The situation changed when Italian scholars rediscovered it at the beginning of the following century. The rediscovery of Occitan in Renaissance Italy has received some attention in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and found systematisation in a fundamental 1911 monograph by Santorre Debenedetti, after which there have been multiple contributions to the theme which explored aspects that he neglected. No new monographs have been produced, however. The principal aim of my work is precisely to produce a new monograph on the Cinquecento rediscovery of Occitan, studying it in the context of the century's linguistic debate, known as Questione della lingua. By adopting this point of view, I hope to address a research question that Debenedetti leaves unanswered, namely, if - as he rightly says - the scholars that rediscovered Occitan worked in isolation from one another and proved unable to cooperate, then how is it possible that they all focused their attention on the same subject at the same time? The intellectuals that will be studied include: Angelo Colocci, Pietro Bembo, Benedetto Varchi, Lodovico Castelvetro, and Giammaria Barbieri. The thesis will explore the relevance and significance of the fact all these scholars were at the same time at the forefront of the Questione and of the recovery of the troubadours. The study is also intended to update Debenedetti's 1911 study, since, as well as incorporating the conclusions of more recent scholarship, it adopts a new approach that is attentive to both the Italian language question and to questions of chronology. As an appendix to the thesis (but also a further major aim for the research), I will edit the unfinished treatise Arte del rimare written by Giammaria Barbieri in the 1570s, in which the Occitan studies of the century reach their culmination.The thesis itself will reassess the existing bibliography and the works of the scholars involved in order to probe how their work on the troubadours intersected with their discussion of the Questione. During the first year, I have focused on one of the very first contributors to the Questione, Angelo Colocci, who was also the first Italian in the century to come into possession of a troubadour manuscript. Colocci used the manuscript to learn its forgotten language, and once he had mastered it to some extent, he began identifying linguistic and literary similarities between Occitan and other Romance languages and literatures. This led him to perceive Romance medieval poetry as a unity and to develop a 'comparative method' not dissimilar from the one that characterises contemporary Romance philology and linguistics. Colocci's perception of these connections between different linguistic domains led him to develop a linguistic theory that actively encouraged recourse to other languages as a means to enrich one's own. Thus, Colocci's case offers an excellent example of how troubadour poetry was used as a source to justify one's theoretical positions in the Questione. Similar studies will be undertaken for the other figures listed above.For the edition, I will use the methods of authorial philology and genetic criticism in order to reconstruct the various phases of Barbieri's work on his book. For missing leaves in the extant manuscripts, I will have to rely on the only existing edition of the work, a 1790 print dating to before the pages went missing. For the parts that only survive in the print, I will adopt the reconstructive methods of traditional philology. So far, I have transcribed the entirety of the original manuscripts in Bologna thanks to a travel grant from Oxford University, and I have done the same with an exemplar of the 1790 print kept at the Taylorian library.

12世纪和13世纪之间由奥克西坦游吟诗人创作的抒情诗是欧洲诗歌传统的根源。尽管它很重要，但在世纪晚期和15世纪之间，它在整个欧洲都被忽视了。在下一个世纪初，意大利学者重新发现了它，情况发生了变化。欧西坦语在文艺复兴时期意大利的重新发现在19世纪末和20世纪初受到了一些关注，并在桑托雷·德贝内代蒂（Santorre Debenedetti）1911年的一本基础专著中得到了系统化，此后，对这一主题的多个贡献探讨了他忽视的方面。但是，没有编写新的专著。我工作的主要目的正是要制作一本关于奥克语在五十世纪重新发现的新专著，在世纪的语言辩论的背景下研究奥克语，被称为《语言学》。通过采用这种观点，我希望解决德贝内代蒂留下的一个研究问题，即，如果-正如他正确地说-重新发现奥克语的学者彼此孤立地工作，并且证明无法合作，那么他们怎么可能在同一时间将注意力集中在同一主题上？将要研究的知识分子包括：安杰洛·科洛奇、彼得罗·本博、贝内代托·瓦尔基、洛多维科·卡斯特维特罗和贾玛丽亚·巴比埃里。本文将探讨所有这些学者同时站在吟游诗人复兴和复兴的最前沿这一事实的相关性和意义。这项研究也是为了更新德贝内代蒂的1911年的研究，因为，以及纳入最近的奖学金的结论，它采用了一种新的方法，既注意到意大利语的问题和问题的年表。作为论文的附录（也是研究的另一个主要目标），我将编辑Giammaria Barbieri在16世纪70年代撰写的未完成的论文Arte del rimare，这是世纪欧西坦语研究的高潮。本文将重新评估现有的参考书目和相关学者的著作，以探讨他们对游吟诗人的研究如何与他们对欧西坦语的讨论相结合。你好在第一年，我重点关注了《问题》的最早贡献者之一安吉洛·科洛奇（Angelo Colocci），他也是该世纪第一位拥有游吟诗人手稿的意大利人。科洛奇用这份手稿来学习被遗忘的语言，一旦他在某种程度上掌握了它，他开始识别奥克语和其他罗曼语和文学之间的语言和文学相似之处。这使他将中世纪浪漫主义诗歌视为一个整体，并发展出一种与当代浪漫主义语言学和语言学特征相似的“比较方法”。科洛奇对不同语言领域之间的联系的认识使他发展了一种语言学理论，积极鼓励人们求助于其他语言，作为丰富自己语言的一种手段。因此，科洛奇的案例提供了一个很好的例子，说明游吟诗人的诗歌是如何被用作证明一个人在《古兰经》中的理论立场的来源的。对以上所列的其他人物也将进行类似的研究。对于这个版本，我将使用作者文献学和发生学批评的方法，以重建巴比里在他的书中工作的各个阶段。对于现存手稿中缺失的书页，我将不得不依靠这部作品的唯一现存版本，这是一部1790年的印刷品，可以追溯到书页丢失之前。对于仅存于印刷品中的部分，则采用传统文献学的重建方法。到目前为止，多亏牛津大学的旅行补助，我已经在博洛尼亚转录了全部原始手稿，我也对保存在泰勒图书馆的1790年印刷品样本做了同样的事情。