Queering Borders: Negotiating Subjectivities in Kenya's Kakuma Refugee Camp

酷儿边界：肯尼亚卡库马难民营的主体性谈判

• 批准号: 2570485
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: University of Warwick
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2021
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2021 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2570485
• 关键词: Queering; Borders; Negotiating; Subjectivities; Kenya

While important advances have been made towards queer visibility and acceptance on the African continent, queer lives are frequently marked as criminal and dangerous. The fact that same-sex sexual activities are criminalized in 32 of the 54 African nations-the death penalty in three-serves as a salient reminder of this. As long as countries and communities continue to criminalize and discriminate against queer persons, refugee protection will thus remain essential and, in many ways, continue to be one of the only ways of ensuring the rights of queer persons and groups on the continent. However, while queer claimants can seek asylum based on their sexual orientation and gender identity and expression (SOGIE), the process of legitimising their claim through their lived experiences poses several challenges. Despite the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees' (UNHCR) acknowledgement that claimants' experiences are not necessarily translatable into western terminology, for example, the use of 'LGBTI' is still normatively preferable. The legitimacy of refugees' claims may thus depend on their ability to negotiate and translate lived experiences into a recognizable (western) lexicon. Whilst the western discourse of gender and sexuality is currently the dominant means through which the protection of queer refugees is understood, this thesis contends that a more contextualised politics of queer empowerment is possible and, in many cases, more effective.With this in mind, this thesis aims to decentre stable definitions of sexual orientation and gender identity, focussing on Kenya's Kakuma Refugee Camp, by shifting attention to how they are lived. It does so, guided by an emphasis on the argument that amplifying the experiences of queer refugees in the global South is vital for finding viable solutions to current challenges. The methodological approach of this thesis is qualitative and guided by the daily experiences of queer refugees in Kenya's Kakuma Refugee Camp. The research methods will be experiential in design, drawing on photovoice, problem-centred interviews, and focus group sessions. By inviting refugees to document their experiences through photography, they could wield greater decision-making power over the representation of their subjectivities. . In addition, both problem-centred interviews and focus group sessions will be conducted and analysed using a decolonial lens. Texts written by Ngugi, Spivak, Oyewumi, and Lugones, amongst others, will provide strategies for how to do decolonial research. The aim of this research is not only to recognise the plurality of gender and sexual expression, therefore, but also to acknowledge the importance of conceptualising representations of queer refugees beyond the normative confines of western ontologies. In this way, this thesis seeks to provide a more complex, decolonial picture of resistance and self-representation and productively expose the limited scope of human rights discourse when addressing queer refugees.KeywordsQueer, Migration, Refugee, decolonial thought, epistemologies of the South, Eurocentrism, imagination, ontology, reality, sociology.

虽然酷儿在非洲大陆的知名度和接受度方面取得了重大进展，但酷儿的生活经常被标记为犯罪和危险。在54个非洲国家中，有32个国家将同性性行为定为犯罪，其中3个国家判处死刑，这一事实就是一个明显的提醒。只要一些国家和社区继续将同性恋定为犯罪并歧视同性恋者，难民保护就仍然是必不可少的，并且在许多方面仍然是确保非洲大陆同性恋者和群体权利的唯一途径之一。然而，尽管酷儿申请人可以基于他们的性取向和性别认同和表达（SOGIE）寻求庇护，但通过他们的生活经历使他们的要求合法化的过程带来了一些挑战。尽管联合国难民事务高级专员公署（UNHCR）承认索赔人的经历不一定可以翻译成西方术语，例如，使用“LGBTI”仍然是规范的首选。因此，难民要求的合法性可能取决于他们谈判的能力，以及将生活经历转化为可识别的（西方）词汇的能力。虽然西方的性别和性话语目前是理解酷儿难民保护的主要手段，但本文认为，一种更情境化的酷儿赋权政治是可能的，而且在许多情况下，更有效。考虑到这一点，本文旨在分散性取向和性别认同的稳定定义，重点关注肯尼亚的卡库马难民营，将注意力转移到他们的生活方式上。它是这样做的，它强调的论点是，扩大全球南方酷儿难民的经历对于找到应对当前挑战的可行解决方案至关重要。本文的研究方法是定性的，并以肯尼亚卡库马难民营酷儿难民的日常经历为指导。研究方法将采用体验式设计，采用照片语音、以问题为中心的访谈和焦点小组会议。通过邀请难民通过摄影记录他们的经历，他们可以对他们的主体性的表现行使更大的决策权。此外，以问题为中心的面谈和焦点小组会议将以非殖民化的角度进行和分析。Ngugi, Spivak， Oyewumi和lugoones等人撰写的文本将为如何进行非殖民化研究提供策略。因此，本研究的目的不仅是认识到性别和性表达的多元性，而且认识到概念化酷儿难民超越西方本体论规范界限的重要性。通过这种方式，本论文试图提供一个更复杂的、非殖民化的抵抗和自我表现的画面，并有效地揭示了在处理酷儿难民时人权话语的有限范围。关键词：移民、难民、非殖民化思想、南方认识论、欧洲中心主义、想象、本体论、现实、社会学。