课题基金 / 基金详情

The Red Scare on the Waterfront: A Transnational Assessment of the Suppression of International Maritime Solidarity, 1950-1955

The Red Scare on the Waterfront: A Transnational Assessment of the Suppression of International Maritime Solidarity, 1950-1955
海滨的红色恐慌:对 1950-1955 年国际海事团结压制的跨国评估
批准号:
2596022
负责人:
金额:
$0.0万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Studentship
财政年份:
2021
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
未结题
起止时间:
2021 至 --

项目摘要

项目成果

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
考察在战后红色恐慌期间对激进的美国、澳大利亚和英国海事联盟的压制是如何促成现代社会和经济问题的。它侧重于美国1950年的《马格努森法案》,以及这项压制性立法和它所表现出的跨国冲动如何对几个原因产生了负面影响,包括独立运动、公民权利和同性恋权利。这项工作将分析工会可以通过倡导少数群体在社会中发挥的关键作用。-马格努森法案揭示了红色恐慌对公民和同性恋权利的影响?-马格努森法案是西方自由民主国家在马歇尔计划和朝鲜战争期间压制海上团结网络的更广泛努力的一部分吗?-跨国反共以及种族和同性恋权利问题能否在美国、英国和澳大利亚的背景下通过海事工人及其工会的棱镜来审查?-针对英国和澳大利亚海事工会的反共措施如何阻碍反殖民主义运动?受红色恐慌影响最大的是海事工人,尽管《马格努森法案》增加了对美国公民和同性恋权利的影响,但它仍然是一个特殊的历史盲点。(该法规在《耶鲁法律评论》上的最后一次全面分析导致了随后的零星审查。)这项立法恰逢英国和澳大利亚政府对共产主义主导的海事联盟施加压力,此前从未探索过这种联系。该项目将研究战后对激进的海事工会的镇压如何导致英语世界长期存在的社会不平等,正是这种不平等促使了黑人生命也是一场运动。这项立法启动了美国历史上最大的工人黑名单,但历史学家尚未充分研究政府、工会和民权组织如何接受《马格努森法案》,将其作为一种机制,将少数群体从海上就业中剔除。清洗据称具有颠覆性的海事工人是对不确定的国际局势的务实回应。缺乏对该法案影响的研究意味着红色恐慌的范围没有得到充分的评估,也没有对国际因素进行评估。这个项目将通过展示立法如何与以英语为母语的人镇压激进的海事联盟有关,以及对国内和国际社会运动的影响来解决这个问题。艾伦将重新审视霍夫斯塔特的断言,即红色恐慌是偏执的右翼分子在左翼看到的东西。所有可用的文件都将被仔细审查,以确定似乎左翼组织将红色恐慌用于内部和派系目的的程度。(集体退位理论可能会解释组织如何以与他们的抱负背道而驰的方式将少数群体边缘化。)红色恐慌对公民自由的抑制,尽管早期左翼海事工会与同性恋权利之间存在联系,但这表明,对激进工会的压制对少数群体权利的组织和活动产生了负面影响。这一分析将为红色恐慌提供一个新的视角,通过研究群体如何受到为保护他们而设立的组织的迫害,超越国家对少数群体的迫害。该项目将是《马格努森法案》第一次深入研究,也是第一次对镇压左翼海事工会主义的持续影响进行跨国审查。
英文摘要
Examine how suppression of radical American, Australian, and British maritime unions, during the post-war Red Scare, has contributed to modern social and economic issues. It focusses on the US Magnuson Act of 1950, and how this suppressive legislation and the transnational impulses of which it was symptomatic, negatively affected several causes, including independence movements, and civil and gay rights. This work will analyse the critical role that trade unions can play in society by advocating for minority groups. -What did the Magnuson Act reveal about the Red Scare's effect on civil and gay rights? -Was the Magnuson Act part of a broader effort by western, liberal democracies to suppress maritime solidarity networks during the Marshall Plan and Korean War?-Can transnational anti-communism and questions of race and gay rights be examined through the prism of maritime workers and their unions in US, British, and Australian contexts?-How did anti-communist measures aimed at British and Australian maritime unions impede anti-colonialist movements? No other section of American society was more affected by the Red Scare than maritime workers and yet the Magnuson Act remains a peculiar historical blind-spot, despite its added impacts on American civil and gay rights. (The statute's last, comprehensive analysis, in the Yale Law Review, led to sporadic, subsequent examinations.) The legislation coincided with pressure exerted by the British and Australian governments on communist-dominated maritime unions, links have not previously been explored. The project will examine how the post-war suppression of radical maritime unionism contributed to long-term social inequalities in the Anglophone world of the kind that prompted the Black Lives Matter movement. The legislation initiated the largest blacklisting of workers in US history, yet historians have not fully examined how the government, unions, and civil rights organisations embraced the Magnuson Act as a mechanism by which to remove minority groups from maritime employment. The purging of allegedly subversive maritime workers constituted a pragmatic response to an uncertain international situation. The lack of research on the act's effects means that the Red Scare's scope has not been fully evaluated; nor have international factors been appraised. This project will address this by showing how the legislation connected to Anglophone suppression of radical maritime unions, and the effects on domestic and international social movements.Allen will re-examine Hofstadter's assertion that the Red Scare was something visited upon the left by a paranoid right. All available documentation will be scrutinised to establish the extent to which seemingly left-wing organisations used the Red Scare for internal and factional purposes. (The Theory of Collective Abdication may explain how organisations might marginalise minorities, in ways contrary to their ambitions.) Red Scare inhibition of civil liberties, despite earlier links between left-wing maritime unions and gay rights, demonstrate that the suppression of radical unions negatively impacted the organisation and activity of minority rights. The analysis will provide a new perspective on the Red Scare, looking beyond state persecution of minorities by examining how groups can be persecuted by organisations established to protect them. The project will be the Magnuson Act's first in-depth study and the first transnational examination of the ongoing impact on the suppression of left-wing maritime unionism.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
海外基金