The Role of Journalists in Reporting End of Life Decisions: Questions of Ethics, Law and Democratic Citizenship

记者在报道临终决定中的作用：道德、法律和民主公民身份问题

• 批准号: 2601843
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: CARDIFF UNIVERSITY
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2021
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2021 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2601843
• 关键词: Role; Journalists; Reporting; End; Life

An end-of-life decision is usually made in response to suffering, to alleviate the pain and symptoms of a critically ill patient. However, it is not always that straight-forward with the ability of the patient to make rational decisions often coming into question. End-of-life decisions regarding infants or during pregnancy when foetal malformation occurs is also problematic. There are varying arguments relating to the moral and ethical nature of these decisions. This topic is widely debated with some focusing on the issue of individual rights while others argue in favour of social obligations. In terms of the media, it is often regulated by the law which in turn guides the topics that are being reported. This brings into question the objectivity of journalists in reporting end-of-life decisions. With different countries taking different stances, it's important to develop a wider understanding of this issue as each country has its own laws and beliefs which are ultimately filtered down to the public. However, democratic political systems are partially led by the public who are able to vote for their preferred leading party.The aim of this research is to develop a detailed and equal analysis on the role of journalism in reporting on end-of-life decisions, drawing on a number of questions to effectively analyse the topic. The purpose is to draw attention to the various arguments and considerations. Media can influence the public but media publications can also be influenced by external factors. The topic is complex and requires detailed research, thought and insight in order to come to an informed and knowledgeable conclusion.

生命终结的决定通常是为了应对痛苦，减轻危重病人的痛苦和症状。然而，它并不总是那么直截了当，患者做出理性决定的能力经常受到质疑。关于婴儿或怀孕期间发生胎儿畸形时的生命终结决定也是有问题的。关于这些决定的道德和伦理性质，有各种不同的论点。这一专题得到广泛辩论，有些侧重于个人权利问题，而另一些则主张社会义务。就媒体而言，它往往受到法律的管制，而法律反过来又指导着报道的主题。这使人们对记者报道生命终结决定的客观性产生了疑问。由于不同的国家采取不同的立场，重要的是要对这个问题有更广泛的理解，因为每个国家都有自己的法律和信仰，最终会被公众所接受。然而，民主政治制度在一定程度上是由公众领导的，公众可以投票选举他们喜欢的领导政党，本研究的目的是对新闻业在报道临终决定方面的作用进行详细和平等的分析，利用一些问题来有效地分析这一主题。目的是提请注意各种论点和考虑。媒体可以影响公众，但媒体出版物也会受到外部因素的影响。这个主题很复杂，需要详细的研究，思考和洞察力，以便得出知情和知识渊博的结论。