Roads for Equitable Integration: The Impact of the UK ESOL Policy on Refugees' Socio-cultural Resilience, Inclusion and Citizenship
Roads for Equitable Integration: The Impact of the UK ESOL Policy on Refugees' Socio-cultural Resilience, Inclusion and Citizenship
批准号:
2604283
负责人:
金额:
$0.0万
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Studentship
财政年份:
2021
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
未结题
起止时间:
2021 至 --
中文摘要
他的项目旨在探索向英国被迫移民教授英语的新方法,以促进公平参与和融合。该项目借鉴了应用语言学研究,将语言教学和学习如何与身份和成为的意识形态构建紧密联系在一起(Callan, 2014; Holliday, 2016; Cooke和Peutrell, 2019)。这项研究的意义在于,它有可能通过偏离当前的ESOL政策,为重塑英国的其他语言使用者英语(ESOL)做出贡献,该政策将整合与基于单一单一的文化价值观(称为“英国基本价值观”)的公民模式联系起来(Cooke et al., 2015; Cooke and Peutrell, 2019)。目前的做法是有问题的,因为它在两个方面与多样性和平等公民身份的原则相矛盾。首先,它不支持承认和确认难民学习者的社会文化身份的公平参与,因为它完全以接受一套价值观和语言规范为社会成员的条件。其次,这种方法根据社会文化和语言规范的交换价值将人们分层,没有给学习者留下反对这种分层的空间。出于这个原因,当前的ESOL政策可能会再次强化一定程度的“他者性”,因为它可能会给ESOL学习者留下这样的印象,即他们自己的社会文化现实与预期的文化价值观不一致。实际上,大多数英国人的价值观都可以被视为共同的价值观,而官方的ESOL政策制定者坚持不使用这个词。相反,他们坚持认为,强化一套生活价值观,使“英国对所有公民来说都像家一样”(HM Government, 2019a: 11),并使“人们在现代、多元化的英国生活”(同上:13)。
英文摘要
his project aims to explore new approaches to teaching English to forced migrants in the UK in order to promote equitable participation and integration. The project draws on applied linguistics research that brings together how language teaching and learning is tightly linked to the ideological construction of identities and becoming (Callan, 2014; Holliday, 2016; Cooke and Peutrell, 2019). The significance of this research stems from its potential to contribute to reimagining English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) in the UK, by deviating from the current ESOL policy that links integration with a citizenship model based on a single monolithic set of cultural values called 'the fundamental British values' (Cooke et al., 2015; Cooke and Peutrell, 2019). This current approach is problematic as it contradicts the principles of diversity and equitable citizenship in two ways. First, it does not support equitable participation that recognises and validates the socio-cultural identities of refugee learners as it exclusively conditions social membership upon embracing one set of values and linguistic norms. Second, this approach stratifies people according to the exchange value of their socio-cultural and linguistic norms, leaving no room for learners to contest this stratification. For this reason, there is a risk that current ESOL policies could re-enforce a degree of 'otherness' as it may leave ESOL learners with the impression that their own socio-cultural realities are at odds with expected cultural values. In reality, most British values can arguably be seen as shared values, a term that official ESOL policymakers insist on not using. Rather, they insist that reinforcing one set of values to live by makes "the UK feel like home for all citizens" (HM Government, 2019a: 11) and equips "people for life in modern, diverse Britain" (ibid: 13).
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
海外基金