'Flexible Subjects: A Contemporary Critical Theory of'Flexibility'/Precarity

本研究旨在通过批判性地探索现有的术语定义，并试图通过具体的当代例子为当代英国社会定义一个更清晰、更直接适用的定义，从而更好地定义当代英国不稳定劳动的形式。本研究将有助于对就业不足及其与要求福利和“工作费”的现实重叠的辩论。“自营职业”--或者已经个性化和碎片化的经验的进一步个性化和碎片化（Fleming 2017，摩尔2017，惠顿2003）--并且确实是对社会主体的代理的调查，在竞争不稳定劳动的例子中：可以说，基层工会的相当大的成功是范例。

This study will aim to better define the forms precarious labourtakes in the contemporary UK by critically exploring existingdefinitions of the term and seeking to contribute to definingaclearer and more directly applicable definition to contemporaryUK society using specific contemporary examples.The study willaim to contribute to debates on underemployment and itssometime overlap with the reality of claiming benefits and'workfare', 'self-employment' - or the further individualization andfragmentation of an already individualized and fragmentedexperience (Fleming2017, Moore 2017, Whitton 2003) - and indeeda survey of the agency of the social subject, in examples ofcontesting precarious labour: the considerable successes of baseunions being arguably, the paradigm example.