Graduate Driver Licensing: Lower Exposure/Better Driving
毕业驾驶执照:更低的暴露/更好的驾驶
基本信息
- 批准号:7073687
- 负责人:
- 金额:$ 9.34万
- 依托单位:
- 依托单位国家:美国
- 项目类别:
- 财政年份:2006
- 资助国家:美国
- 起止时间:2006-05-01 至 2008-04-30
- 项目状态:已结题
- 来源:
- 关键词:adolescence (12-20)behavioral /social science research tagdata collection methodology /evaluationdevelopmental psychologyeducation evaluation /planninghuman datahuman mortalitylegal /correctionalmathematical modelmodel design /developmentstatistics /biometrytrainingtransportation /recreation safetyvehicular accident
项目摘要
DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The literature on teenage driving indicates that teenagers are at elevated risk for motor vehicle crashes. In 2003, teenagers (ages 13-19) accounted for 10% of the U.S. population, and 13% of motor vehicle crash deaths. In 2001, motor vehicle crashes were the top reason for death among the teenagers. 41 % of the female teenage fatalities and 34% of the male teenage fatalities resulted from a motor vehicle crash. Various studies have attributed this increased risk level to factors such as the fact that teenagers have low level of driving experience, tend to drive at riskier times (night-time), and usually carry other teenage passengers in their car, leading to a distracting environment for the driver. Starting in 1996, states have responded to these concerns by adopting graduated driver licensing (GDL) policies to reduce traffic hazards for teenagers. Previous literature evaluating the impact of graduated driver licensing (GDL) policies of the 1990s has demonstrated the policies' effectiveness on reducing teenage involved fatal crashes. However, much remains unanswered: Why do they work? How do they work? Will the initial effects erode? How might they be improved? The difficulty in answering questions above have been due to the unavailability of good estimates of how many teenage drivers are on the roads at any given time, and how that varies with the GDL policies. In particular, there is limited evidence suggesting whether these policies achieve favorable results by improving teenage driving behavior, or by simply limiting the amount of teenage driving temporarily. To fill this gap, we will first build a model that relates the amount of teenage driving and riskiness of teenage driving to the state level GDL policies for each state-year pair using a novel econometric framework. We will then estimate the parameters of this model using data from the Fatal Accident Reporting System (PARS) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's (NHTSA) General Estimates System (GES), 1990- 2005. Our primary aim is to assess the relative effectiveness of the GDL policies on limiting the amount of teenage driving and on improving teenage driving. We also aim to understand which components of the GDL policies (adult supervision, nighttime restrictions, teenage passenger limits) contribute to better driving as opposed to limited driving. Finally, we would like to study the dynamics of the GDL policies, and understand whether they have sustained long-term effects in terms of improved teenage driving behavior.
描述(由申请人提供):关于青少年驾驶的文献表明,青少年发生机动车碰撞的风险较高。2003年,青少年(13-19岁)占美国人口的10%,占机动车事故死亡人数的13%。2001年,车祸是青少年死亡的首要原因。41%的女性青少年死亡和34%的男性青少年死亡是由机动车碰撞造成的。各种研究将这种风险水平的增加归因于以下因素:青少年的驾驶经验水平较低,倾向于在更危险的时间(夜间)驾驶,并且通常车上载有其他青少年乘客,导致司机分心的环境。从1996年开始,各州对这些担忧做出了回应,采用了分级驾驶执照(GDL)政策,以减少青少年的交通危险。先前的文献评估了20世纪90年代毕业驾驶执照(GDL)政策的影响,证明了该政策在减少青少年致命车祸方面的有效性。然而,仍有许多问题没有得到解答:它们为什么起作用?它们是如何工作的?最初的影响会消退吗?如何改进它们?回答上述问题的困难是由于无法准确估计在任何给定时间有多少青少年司机在路上,以及这与GDL政策有何不同。特别是,这些政策是通过改善青少年驾驶行为,还是仅仅通过暂时限制青少年驾驶数量来达到有利效果的证据有限。为了填补这一空白,我们将首先建立一个模型,使用一个新的计量经济学框架,将青少年驾驶的数量和青少年驾驶的风险与每个州-年份对的州一级GDL政策联系起来。然后,我们将使用致命事故报告系统(PARS)和国家公路交通安全管理局(NHTSA)一般估计系统(GES) 1990- 2005年的数据来估计该模型的参数。我们的主要目的是评估GDL政策在限制青少年驾驶数量和改善青少年驾驶方面的相对有效性。我们还旨在了解GDL政策的哪些组成部分(成人监督、夜间限制、青少年乘客限制)有助于提高驾驶水平,而不是限制驾驶。最后,我们想研究GDL政策的动态,并了解它们是否在改善青少年驾驶行为方面具有持续的长期影响。
项目成果
期刊论文数量(0)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}
PINAR KARACA-MANDIC其他文献
PINAR KARACA-MANDIC的其他文献
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
{{ truncateString('PINAR KARACA-MANDIC', 18)}}的其他基金
Rapid learning during a public health emergency: COVID-19 related medication treatment patterns in Medicare
突发公共卫生事件期间的快速学习:医疗保险中与 COVID-19 相关的药物治疗模式
- 批准号:
10711497 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 9.34万 - 项目类别:
Medical reversals: De-implementing ineffective and unsafe treatments
医疗逆转:取消无效和不安全治疗的实施
- 批准号:
9753151 - 财政年份:2017
- 资助金额:
$ 9.34万 - 项目类别:
Physician Level Analysis of Medical Technology Diffusion: Coronary Stents Study
医疗技术扩散的医师水平分析:冠状动脉支架研究
- 批准号:
8530134 - 财政年份:2010
- 资助金额:
$ 9.34万 - 项目类别:
Physician Level Analysis of Medical Technology Diffusion: Coronary Stents Study
医疗技术扩散的医师水平分析:冠状动脉支架研究
- 批准号:
8721292 - 财政年份:2010
- 资助金额:
$ 9.34万 - 项目类别:
Physician Level Analysis of Medical Technology Diffusion: A Study of Coronary Ste
医疗技术扩散的医师水平分析:冠心病研究
- 批准号:
8043966 - 财政年份:2010
- 资助金额:
$ 9.34万 - 项目类别:
Physician Level Analysis of Medical Technology Diffusion: Coronary Stents Study
医疗技术扩散的医师水平分析:冠状动脉支架研究
- 批准号:
8149850 - 财政年份:2010
- 资助金额:
$ 9.34万 - 项目类别:
Physician Level Analysis of Medical Technology Diffusion: Coronary Stents Study
医疗技术扩散的医师水平分析:冠状动脉支架研究
- 批准号:
8316268 - 财政年份:2010
- 资助金额:
$ 9.34万 - 项目类别:
The Role of Agents and Brokers in the Market for Health Insurance - Do They Help
代理人和经纪人在健康保险市场中的作用 - 他们有帮助吗
- 批准号:
7774730 - 财政年份:2009
- 资助金额:
$ 9.34万 - 项目类别:
Analysis of Graduate Driver Licensing: Lower Risk Exposure or Better Driving?
毕业驾驶执照分析:降低风险还是更好的驾驶?
- 批准号:
7562876 - 财政年份:2006
- 资助金额:
$ 9.34万 - 项目类别:














{{item.name}}会员




