Privacy vs Protection: The right to private & family life in the EU Immigration and Asylum System & the lived experiences of asylum seekers in Greece

这篇论文将批判性地审视欧洲的庇护和移民法律制度，重点关注围绕隐私和家庭生活的斗争。隐私权和家庭生活权载入国际法和国内法，但在实践中经常受到侵犯，包括在旨在为难民和寻求庇护者提供保护的过程中。欧洲共同和庇护制度(CEAS)创造了法律“灰色漏洞”(爱德华兹2020)，允许持续监视、不受管制的身体搜查、没收财物和侵入性讯问。索菲亚将使用人种学方法进行分析，并与在希腊的难民和寻求庇护者接触，主要是与LGBTI+个人接触，这些人往往处于不得不分享私人信息才能获得处理的危险境地。她的目标将是评估在欧洲庇护确定过程中未经授权侵犯隐私的程度，这些行为的后果，以及未来可以保护寻求庇护者隐私的补救措施。

This thesis will critically examine the European Asylum and Immigration legal regime with a focus on struggles around privacy and family life. The right to privacy and family life is enshrined in international and national law, but routinely violated in practice including during the very process that is designed to afford protection to refugees and asylum seekers. The Common European and Asylum System (CEAS) creates legal "grey holes" (Edwards 2020) that allow for constant surveillance, unregulated body-searches, confiscation of belongings, and intrusive questioning. Sophia will conduct analysis with ethnographic methods and engage with refugees and asylum seekers in Greece, and primarily with LGBTI+ individuals, who are often in the precarious position of having to share private information in order for their claims to be processed. Her goals will be to assess the extent of unauthorised breaches of privacy during the asylum determination process in Europe, the consequences of these, and what remedies could safeguard asylum seekers' privacy in the future.