权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

What is the aim of contemporary philosophy of consciousness? - to show the fly the way back into the bottle

当代意识哲学的目标是什么？

基本信息

批准号：
2885911
负责人：
金额：
--
依托单位：
University of Liverpool
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Studentship
财政年份：
2023
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2023 至无数据
项目状态：
未结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2885911
关键词：
What aim contemporary philosophy consciousness

项目摘要

Between 1945 and the mid-1970s British philosophy of mind was dominated by the legacies of the later-Wittgenstein and J. L. Austin. According to these philosophers, seemingly substantive philosophical questions about the nature of consciousness would be solved by 'looking into the workings of our language' and not by metaphysical or scientific method.However, by the end of the 1970s that dominance was broken. Speculative metaphysics re-emerged and it became orthodoxy that the philosophical study of consciousness, pace Wittgenstein and Austin, was continuous with scientific study thereof.Fifty years later, philosophers have made little progress on the so-called 'hard problem of consciousness'. This thesis asks whether the rejection of the methods of so-called 'Ordinary Language Philosophy' has led to valuable lessons and insights being lost.I will investigate, and argue, that the main forces behind the rejection of these methods are institutional and cultural rather than philosophical. I intend to show that insights from OLP that are unacknowledged in much of contemporary philosophy of consciousness constitute an important, and still relevant, critique.My research will:1. Examine OLP's contribution to the philosophy of mind.2. Employ this analysis to critique contemporary philosophical discussions of consciousness.3. Explore the social and cultural factors which led to the demise of OLP.4. Assess the philosophical arguments levied against OLP.5. In light of 3 and 4, assess the assumptions of contemporary philosophers of consciousness and re-assess the challenges posed by OLP.

从1945年到20世纪70年代中期，英国心灵哲学被后期维特根斯坦和J。奥斯汀根据这些哲学家的说法，关于意识本质的看似实质性的哲学问题将通过“研究我们语言的运作”而不是通过形而上学或科学方法来解决。然而，到20世纪70年代末，这种主导地位被打破。思辨形而上学重新出现，维特根斯坦和奥斯汀对意识的哲学研究与科学研究相结合，成为正统。50年后，哲学家们在所谓的“意识难题”上几乎没有取得进展。本文探讨的是，对所谓“日常语言哲学”方法的拒绝是否导致了宝贵的教训和见解的丢失。我将调查并论证，拒绝这些方法背后的主要力量是制度和文化，而不是哲学。我打算表明，在当代意识哲学的大部分领域中没有得到承认的OLP的见解构成了一个重要的、仍然相关的批判。研究OLP对心灵哲学的贡献。2.运用这种分析来批判当代哲学对意识的讨论。探讨导致OLP.4消亡的社会和文化因素。评估对OLP.5征收的哲学论据。根据3和4，评估当代意识哲学家的假设，重新评估OLP带来的挑战。