Are the current practices of dispute resolution in financial transactions keeping pace with the future of financial markets?

拟议的研究试图找出金融争端方面现有争端解决机制的不足之处，以及潜在国际条约的必要要素，以维持一个能够可持续地支持全球金融市场未来发展的可靠的冲突解决系统。争端解决的完整性是最重要的，因为对金融交易中广泛使用的示范合同的理解存在不准确的司法裁决的潜在后果。这可能会通过受相同模式合约影响的其他交易产生连锁效应，对金融市场产生潜在的不稳定影响。这些标准格式的协议无处不在，加上最近的技术进步和金融产品的错综复杂的性质，因此有必要对目前的争端解决做法进行彻底评估。为此，拟议的研究将评估纽约和英国法院如何对国际金融法做出贡献，同时强调它们在当今世界中的各自局限性。此外，还将探讨可能更有效地满足这些需要的替代争端解决制度。此外，将对构成这一格局的多个因素进行全面的跨部门比较，以便更好地了解什么是可靠的争议解决机制。

The proposed research seeks to identify the deficiencies ofexisting dispute resolution mechanisms in financialdisputes, as well as the necessary elements of a potentialinternational treaty that could maintain a reliable conflictresolution system capable of sustainably supporting futuregrowth within global financial markets. The integrity ofdispute resolution is paramount due to the potentialramifications of inaccurate judicial decisions concerning theunderstanding of widely used model contracts in financialtransactions. This could create a cascade effect throughoutother deals influenced by the same model contracts, withpotentially destabilising implications for the financialmarket. The ubiquity of these standard form agreementscoupled with recent technological advances and theintricate nature of financial products necessitate a thoroughevaluation into current dispute resolution practices. To thisend, the proposed research will evaluate how New York andEnglish courts have contributed to international financiallaw while highlighting their respective limitations in today'sworld. Additionally, alternative dispute resolution systemswill be explored which may potentially address these needsmore effectively. Furthermore, a comprehensive cross sector comparison will be conducted across multiplesectors that comprise this landscape, allowing for a betterunderstanding of what market expectations are fordependable dispute resolution mechanisms.