Including Disability in Social and Cultural Anthropology: From disciplinary absence to enabling environments

文献回顾在过去的三十年里，残疾研究的跨学科领域已经介入了许多学科和大学课程，包括社会工作，社会学，教育和医学（例如，Morgan and Roulstone，2012; Slee，2018; Hunt，2022）.我的研究旨在使社会和文化人类学在教育学，课程，行动研究和反思实践中对残疾人类学家具有包容性;对学者，研究人员和学生。我想探索人类学缺乏残疾和残疾研究的理论原因，为残疾人类学家和对残疾研究感兴趣的社会人类学学生创造更具包容性的实践，空间和社区。我采用社会和文化人类学作为学科案例研究：提出关于残疾、机会、平等和挑战学术能力的更广泛问题（Dolmage，2017年）我的项目的核心目标是在人类学中对后殖民人类学的自反性转向之间的自反性转向的认识需要内。（批评了阿萨德1979年提出的白色人类学家对后殖民空间的关注）和女权主义人类学（见阿维沙伊等人，2012年，旨在将女性研究人员的视角引入人类学研究，以瞄准男性的目光）。虽然知识的两极都带来了卓有成效的学科反思和做人类学研究的新视角，不同于经典的白色男性民族志学者的身体，但这些两极并不关注残疾研究者的身体。因此，我的目标是集中一个残疾研究人员的角色，他的“身心”（Price，2015）与古典人类学家不同。我的方法将更加关注跨性别、性别、种族和跨国界限的残疾问题。此外，我的方法将阐明人类学研究和学科的能力主义性质，因此它将集中在“能力主义规范性”的概念（坎贝尔，2008年）。因此，本研究项目将呼吁在学科中进行一次新的反思转向，超越上述传统和专业知识的两极。我的项目的核心目标是在后殖民人类学的反思转向与后殖民人类学的反思转向之间，（批评了阿萨德1979年提出的白色人类学家对后殖民空间的关注）和女权主义人类学（见阿维沙伊等人，2012年，旨在将女性研究人员的视角引入人类学研究，以瞄准男性的目光）。虽然知识的两极都带来了卓有成效的学科反思和做人类学研究的新视角，不同于经典的白色男性民族志学者的身体，但这些两极并不关注残疾研究者的身体。因此，我的目标是集中一个残疾研究人员的角色，他的“身心”（Price，2015）与古典人类学家不同。我的方法将更加关注跨性别、性别、种族和跨国界限的残疾问题。此外，我的方法将阐明人类学研究和学科的能力主义性质，因此它将集中在“能力主义规范性”的概念（坎贝尔，2008年）。因此，这个研究项目将要求在学科内进行一个新的反思性转向，超越上述传统和专业知识的两极。

Literature reviewOver the last thirty years the interdisciplinary field of disability studies has intervenedin a host of disciplines and university courses including social work, sociology,education and medicine (e.g., Morgan and Roulstone, 2012; Slee, 2018; Hunt,2022).My research seeks to make social and cultural anthropology inclusive for disabledanthropologists in pedagogy, curriculum, action research and reflective practice; foracademics, researchers and students. I want to explore the theoretical reasons foranthropology's lack of engagement with disability and disability studies, to empiricallyresearch and to create more inclusive practices, spaces and communities fordisabled anthropologists and social anthropology students interested in researchingdisability. I adopt social and cultural anthropology as a disciplinary case study: toraise wider issues about disability, access, equity, and challenging academic ableism(Dolmage, 2017)The core aims of my project are situated within the recognized need for a reflexiveturn against ableism in anthropology between the reflexive turn of post-colonialanthropology (which critiques the white anthropologist's gaze on postcolonial spacesas proposed by Asad, 1979) and feminist anthropology (see Avishai et al., 2012which aims to bring the perspective of the female researcher into anthropologicalresearch to target the male gaze). Whilst both poles of knowledge bring fruitfuldisciplinary reflexivity and new perspectives of doing anthropological research thatdiffered from the body of a classical white male ethnographer; these poles do notpay attention to the body of the disabled researcher. Therefore, I will aim to centrethe role of a disabled researcher whose 'bodymind' (Price, 2015) is different to theclassical anthropologist. My approach will pay more attention to an intersectionallens as disability traverses gender, sex, ethnicity and transnational lines. Moreover,my approach will illuminate the ableist nature of anthropological research and thediscipline, it will consequently focus on the concept of 'ableist normativity' (Campbell,2008). Thus, this research project will call for a new reflexive turn within thediscipline that goes beyond the aforementioned traditions and poles of expertise.The core aims of my project are situated within the recognized need for a reflexiveturn against ableism in anthropology between the reflexive turn of post-colonialanthropology (which critiques the white anthropologist's gaze on postcolonial spacesas proposed by Asad, 1979) and feminist anthropology (see Avishai et al., 2012which aims to bring the perspective of the female researcher into anthropologicalresearch to target the male gaze). Whilst both poles of knowledge bring fruitfuldisciplinary reflexivity and new perspectives of doing anthropological research thatdiffered from the body of a classical white male ethnographer; these poles do notpay attention to the body of the disabled researcher. Therefore, I will aim to centrethe role of a disabled researcher whose 'bodymind' (Price, 2015) is different to theclassical anthropologist. My approach will pay more attention to an intersectionallens as disability traverses gender, sex, ethnicity and transnational lines. Moreover,my approach will illuminate the ableist nature of anthropological research and thediscipline, it will consequently focus on the concept of 'ableist normativity' (Campbell,2008). Thus, this research project will call for a new reflexive turn within thediscipline that goes beyond the aforementioned traditions and poles of expertise.