课题基金 / 基金详情

Girlhood in postcolonial India: redefining identities and contexts

Girlhood in postcolonial India: redefining identities and contexts
后殖民印度的少女时代:重新定义身份和背景
批准号:
2887211
负责人:
金额:
$0.0万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Studentship
财政年份:
2023
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
未结题
起止时间:
2023 至 --

项目摘要

项目成果

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
Within India, boyhood proliferates narratives of childhood and girls are relegated to marginal,unobtrusive roles. Until recently, girlhood has been defined negatively, possessing frivolousconnotations, against womanhood, and the Hindu Brahmin urban cis-male experience ofchildhood is extrapolated as being the universal yardstick. It is this critical neglect that I wish toaddress in my doctoral work.My thesis will offer a nuanced portrayal of how Indian conceptualisations of identities ofgirlhood were infused with contemporary, historically contingent notions of sexuality, religion,caste and class. Shifting focus from Ashwini Tambe's legal study Defining Girlhood in India: ATransnational History of Sexual Maturity Laws (2019) and physical issues surrounding thedemarcation from childhood to adulthood, but not omitting them, I would explore concepts offeminist historiography and its engagement with empathy, intersubjectivity, cultural memory,solidarity, and bodily memory (Hirsh and Smith, 2002) within the context of girlhood studies.However, being aware of the limitations of extending "women's issues" onto the lives of girls(Mitchell, 2006), I will cater to the nuanced demands of girlhood. Resisting literary-historicalnarratives that reduce the girl-child in the psycho-social memory as 'an idiom of loss' (Krishnan,2010) as she is meant to 'belong' to her marital home adhering to the patrilineal, patrilocalfamily structure of India, I will focus on the newfound agency of the girl-child in lieu ofeducational reforms, technological advancements, public engagements, and the development ofan affective community in online spaces. Although much has been said about the powerdynamics between the child reader and the author, and the text as a contentious site ofmeaning-making by Jacqueline Rose, Jack Zipes and Peter Hunt among others, I believe it wouldbe worthwhile to reevaluate these theories within the locus of South Asian perspectives.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
海外基金