权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Reimagining Global Constitutionalism: Can a Transformative Constitution Better The International Legal Order

重新构想全球宪政：变革性宪法能否改善国际法律秩序

基本信息

批准号：
2888128
负责人：
金额：
--
依托单位：
University of Manchester
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Studentship
财政年份：
2023
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2023 至无数据
项目状态：
未结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2888128
关键词：
Reimagining Global Constitutionalism Transformative Constitution

项目摘要

Introduction Global Constitutionalism is a governance theory in which the international system comprises core norms including the rule of law, separation of powers, human rights, judicial safeguards, and democratic legitimacy. It regulates and monitors the relations, sources, and exercise of power within the global order. Increasingly scholars have argued for global constitutionalism, claiming that constitutional principles governing relations between nations (Peter, 2015: 1); would increase accountability and the "check on state power," (O'Donoghue, 2013:1045). International legal developments that implement a sense of morality and order; jus cogens, human rights conventions and judicial decisions advocating for state responsibility, have advanced the theory. Although a global constitution now contributes to ordering international practices and behaviours (Lang and Wiener, 2017:1), the poverty of its theory is evident. This thesis sets out the argument that these shortcomings emerge from the neo imperialist background and features of the current global order and its core constitutional norms. The liberal constitution authorises violations of international laws and treaties, and places structural barriers to achieving subsequent justice. Further, it is strategic and ideological in its perseveration of the hierarchy between the Global North and the Global South (Sultany, 2017:306).

全球宪政是一种治理理论，其中国际体系包括核心规范，包括法治，权力分立，人权，司法保障和民主合法性。它规范和监督全球秩序中的关系、来源和权力的行使。越来越多的学者主张全球宪政主义，声称宪法原则管理国家之间的关系（彼得，2015：1）;将增加问责制和“对国家权力的检查”（O 'Donoghue，2013：1045）。国际法律的发展体现了一种道德和秩序感;强行法、人权公约和主张国家责任的司法裁决都推动了这一理论。尽管全球宪法现在有助于规范国际惯例和行为（Lang and Wiener，2017：1），但其理论的贫乏是显而易见的。本文认为，这些缺陷源于新帝国主义的背景和当前全球秩序及其核心宪法规范的特征。自由主义宪法授权违反国际法和条约，并为实现随后的正义设置了结构性障碍。此外，它在坚持全球北方和全球南方之间的等级制度方面具有战略性和意识形态性（Sultany，2017：306）。