Addressing inequities within the Sustainable Development Goals: ensuring "no-one is left behind"

要解决气候变化、生物多样性丧失和可持续发展等多方面的危机，就必须同时解决因性别和地理而严重分化的财富、机会、健康和教育不平等问题。这在可持续发展目标（sdg）本身中得到了承认，具体体现在目标5和10以及更广泛的其他目标中。在制定减缓气候变化的办法和环境保护时，我们可以通过考虑交叉性（适用于个人和群体的社会类别之间的相互联系）来解决可持续发展中的不平等问题。然而，这需要一种基于系统的跨学科方法，结合社会科学、自然科学和数学科学的方法，来理解这些“邪恶”的问题，并找到解决方案。2019冠状病毒病大流行加剧了全球不平等。2022/23年将启动雄心勃勃的新协议，如《联合国气候变化框架公约》第27次缔约方会议、《生物多样性公约》第15次缔约方会议和联合国2030年生物多样性框架。基于自然的解决方案有可能支持这些方案，确保它们通过支持可持续生计，同时加强生态系统服务的提供，支持生物多样性保护，以及提供适应和减缓气候变化的共同效益，实现变革性变革。然而，只有在一开始就考虑到不平等，才能确保成功。该项目将采用基于系统的方法来评估基于自然的解决方案，作为同时实现可持续发展目标中多个目标的一种手段，同时也考虑到交叉性。这一办法将确保考虑到现有的和潜在的不平等，否则这些不平等将破坏对地球健康和福祉至关重要的国际协定和方案的成功。方法将包括半结构化访谈、q-方法学、焦点小组和关键信息提供者访谈，以及元数据分析、内容分析和社会网络分析，以实现四个目标：1)调查目标5和10与其他可持续发展目标之间的内在权衡，了解这些权衡如何影响可持续发展目标的实现。2)绘制联合国系统内相互关联的不同要素的价值体系。3)评估一系列国家统计局计划在应对环境挑战和可持续发展方面的成功，同时解决社会不平等问题。4)制定政策准则，以说明旨在实现可持续发展和环境保护的方案中的不公平现象

Solutions to the multi-faceted crises of climate change, biodiversity loss and sustainable development are not possible without concurrently addressing inequities of wealth, opportunity, health, and education, sharply divided by gender and geography - to name but a few. This is acknowledged within the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) themselves, via Goals 5 and 10 specifically and the other goals more generally. We can address inequities in sustainable development by accounting for intersectionality (the interconnections among social categories as they apply to individuals and groups) when developing climate mitigation approaches and environmental conservation. However, this requires a systems-based, transdisciplinary approach, combining methods from across the social, natural, and mathematical sciences, to develop an understanding of these "wicked" problems and to find solutions.The COVID-19 pandemic has served to exacerbate inequalities globally. 2022/23 sees the launch of ambitious new agreements, such as the UNFCCC COP27, CBD COP15 and the UN 2030 Framework for Biodiversity. Nature-based solutions (NbS) have the potential to support these programmes to ensure they deliver transformative change through supporting sustainable livelihoods whilst enhancing the provision of ecosystem services, supporting biodiversity conservation, and providing the co-benefits of climate change adaptation and mitigation. However, success will only be assured if inequities are accounted for during their inception. This project will take a systems-based approach to evaluate nature-basedsolutions as a means of implementing multiple goals across the SDGs concurrently, whilst also accounting for intersectionality. This approach will ensure that pre-existing and potential inequities are taken into consideration, inequalities that would otherwise undermine the success of international agreements and programmes that are vital to the planet's health and well-being.Methods will include semi-structured interviews, q-methodology, focus groups, and key informant interviews alongside meta-data analysis, content analysis and social network analysis, to address four objectives:1) To investigate the inherent trade-offs between Goals 5 and 10 and other SDGS to understand how these trade-offs may undermine the achievement of the SDGs.2) To map the values system for different elements of intersectionality within the UN system.3) To evaluate a series of NbS programmes in relation to their success in terms of tackling environmental challenges and sustainable development whilst concurrently addressing social inequities.4) To develop policy guidelines for accounting for inequities in programmes aimed at achieving both sustainable development and environmental protection