End-of-Life Research Ethics: Concerns, Approaches, and Impact

临终研究伦理:担忧、方法和影响

基本信息

  • 批准号:
    7531837
  • 负责人:
  • 金额:
    $ 19.25万
  • 依托单位:
  • 依托单位国家:
    美国
  • 项目类别:
  • 财政年份:
    2008
  • 资助国家:
    美国
  • 起止时间:
    2008-09-26 至 2010-07-31
  • 项目状态:
    已结题

项目摘要

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The growth of the aging population in the United States has led to calls for increased research focused on enhancing end-of-life (EOL) care for dying persons and their family members. A 2004 National Institutes of Health (NIH) State of the Science Conference on Improving EOL Care noted that the current state of knowledge is in its infancy and identified the need for more research on conceptual models, infrastructure, methodological issues, treatment, outcomes, and policy. The Conference recommendations included a call for research on ethical issues, recognizing that research conducted at the EOL raises complex ethical questions related to consent, capacity, proxy decision-making, and the evaluation of risks and benefits that may inhibit the conduct of this vital research and serve as a barrier to the advancement of the science in this area. Questions about how to best balance the pressing need for research with the rights of the dying and their families reflect ethical concerns that trouble investigators, institutional review boards (IRBs), and scientific reviewers alike. Yet, empirical data are lacking regarding best practices for managing these issues to assist in the development of research that balances ethical considerations with the advancement of science. In order to identify best practices for the conduct of EOL research, the aims of this proposal are to: 1) Compare what investigators, institutional review boards, and scientific reviewers identify as ethical concerns in end-of-life research; 2) Identify approaches used by investigators, institutional review boards, and scientific reviewers to resolve ethical concerns in end-of-life research; and 3) Describe the impact of ethical concerns identified by investigators, institutional review boards, and scientific reviewers on the conduct of end-of-life research. End-of-life research will be identified from the web and current literature. Principal investigators of 40-50 studies will be asked to share study documents including grant proposals, scientific reviews, and IRB communications. Qualitative telephone interviews will be conducted with case principal investigators to clarify questions raised by the documents and the impact of ethical concerns on their research. This study is innovative because it uses an exploratory case study design capitalizing on primary data sources to obtain information about the perspectives of key stakeholders responsible for the ethical conduct of research. Study findings will serve to enhance and promote the ethical conduct of human subjects research at the EOL to improve care of the dying and their family members. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: There is a pressing need for increased research on end-of-life care, but ethical concerns have been identified as a possible impediment to the development of this field. The proposed study is designed to assess the perspectives of key stakeholders responsible for the review, approval, and ethical conduct of research to better understand how ethical concerns shape the development of end-of-life studies. At the completion of this study, data will be available to: (a) describe the characteristics of ethical concerns that arise in the conduct of end-of-life research; (b) identify approaches to resolve ethical concerns for use in the design and review of end-of-life research; and (c) understand the impact of ethical concerns on the conduct of end-of-life research.
描述(由申请人提供):美国人口老龄化的增长导致人们呼吁增加研究,重点是加强对临终者及其家人的临终关怀。2004年美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)关于改善EOL护理的科学状态会议指出,目前的知识处于起步阶段,并确定需要对概念模型,基础设施,方法学问题,治疗,结果和政策进行更多的研究。会议的建议包括呼吁对伦理问题进行研究,认识到在EOL进行的研究提出了与同意、能力、代理决策以及风险和效益评估有关的复杂伦理问题,这些问题可能会抑制这一重要研究的进行,并成为这一领域科学进步的障碍。关于如何最好地平衡研究的迫切需要与垂死者及其家人的权利的问题反映了困扰研究人员,机构审查委员会(IRB)和科学审查员的伦理问题。然而,缺乏关于管理这些问题的最佳做法的经验数据,以协助开展兼顾伦理考虑和科学进步的研究。为了确定开展临终关怀研究的最佳实践,本提案的目的是:1)比较研究者、机构审查委员会和科学审查员在临终关怀研究中确定的伦理问题; 2)确定研究者、机构审查委员会和科学审查员在解决临终关怀研究中的伦理问题时使用的方法; 3)描述研究者、机构审查委员会和科学审查员确定的伦理问题对临终研究的影响。将从网络和当前文献中识别寿命终止研究。40-50项研究的主要研究者将被要求分享研究文件,包括资助申请、科学评论和IRB通信。将与病例主要研究者进行定性电话访谈,以澄清文件提出的问题以及伦理问题对其研究的影响。这项研究是创新的,因为它使用了一个探索性的案例研究设计,利用主要数据源,以获得有关的观点,负责研究的道德行为的关键利益相关者的信息。研究结果将有助于加强和促进人类受试者在EOL研究的道德行为,以改善对临终者及其家人的护理。公共卫生相关性:迫切需要增加对临终关怀的研究,但伦理问题已被确定为这一领域发展的可能障碍。这项拟议的研究旨在评估负责审查、批准和伦理研究的主要利益相关者的观点,以更好地了解伦理问题如何影响生命终末研究的发展。在这项研究完成时,将提供数据:(a)描述在进行临终研究中出现的伦理问题的特点;(B)确定解决伦理问题的方法,用于设计和审查临终研究;(c)了解伦理问题对进行临终研究的影响。

项目成果

期刊论文数量(0)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)

数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}

SUSAN E HICKMAN其他文献

SUSAN E HICKMAN的其他文献

{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

{{ truncateString('SUSAN E HICKMAN', 18)}}的其他基金

A Nursing Home Pragmatic Clinical Trial of APPROACHES (Aligning Patient Preferences: a Role Offering Alzheimer's patient, Caregivers, and Healthcare providers Education and Support)
疗养院实用方法临床试验(调整患者偏好:为阿尔茨海默病患者、护理人员和医疗保健提供者提供教育和支持的角色)
  • 批准号:
    9423503
  • 财政年份:
    2017
  • 资助金额:
    $ 19.25万
  • 项目类别:
A Nursing Home Pragmatic Clinical Trial of APPROACHES (Aligning Patient Preferences: a Role Offering Alzheimer's patient, Caregivers, and Healthcare providers Education and Support)
疗养院实用方法临床试验(调整患者偏好:为阿尔茨海默病患者、护理人员和医疗保健提供者提供教育和支持的角色)
  • 批准号:
    10007077
  • 财政年份:
    2017
  • 资助金额:
    $ 19.25万
  • 项目类别:
A Nursing Home Pragmatic Clinical Trial of APPROACHES (Aligning Patient Preferences: a Role Offering Alzheimer's patient, Caregivers, and Healthcare providers Education and Support)
疗养院实用方法临床试验(调整患者偏好:为阿尔茨海默病患者、护理人员和医疗保健提供者提供教育和支持的角色)
  • 批准号:
    10250086
  • 财政年份:
    2017
  • 资助金额:
    $ 19.25万
  • 项目类别:
A Nursing Home Pragmatic Clinical Trial of APPROACHES (Aligning Patient Preferences: a Role Offering Alzheimer's patient, Caregivers, and Healthcare providers Education and Support)
疗养院实用方法临床试验(调整患者偏好:为阿尔茨海默病患者、护理人员和医疗保健提供者提供教育和支持的角色)
  • 批准号:
    10018605
  • 财政年份:
    2017
  • 资助金额:
    $ 19.25万
  • 项目类别:
The Quality of POLST Decisions in the Nursing Facility Setting
护理机构中 POLST 决策的质量
  • 批准号:
    9488047
  • 财政年份:
    2015
  • 资助金额:
    $ 19.25万
  • 项目类别:
The Quality of POLST Decisions in the Nursing Facility Setting
护理机构中 POLST 决策的质量
  • 批准号:
    9276522
  • 财政年份:
    2015
  • 资助金额:
    $ 19.25万
  • 项目类别:
End-of-Life Research Ethics: Concerns, Approaches, and Impact
临终研究伦理:担忧、方法和影响
  • 批准号:
    7693851
  • 财政年份:
    2008
  • 资助金额:
    $ 19.25万
  • 项目类别:
Converting Treatment Wishes into Orders at End of Life
将治疗愿望转化为临终订单
  • 批准号:
    7124269
  • 财政年份:
    2005
  • 资助金额:
    $ 19.25万
  • 项目类别:
Converting Treatment Wishes into Orders at End of Life
将治疗愿望转化为临终订单
  • 批准号:
    6984286
  • 财政年份:
    2005
  • 资助金额:
    $ 19.25万
  • 项目类别:
Converting Treatment Wishes into Orders at End of Life
将治疗愿望转化为临终订单
  • 批准号:
    7250278
  • 财政年份:
    2005
  • 资助金额:
    $ 19.25万
  • 项目类别:
{{ showInfoDetail.title }}

作者:{{ showInfoDetail.author }}

知道了