Explanatory models of illness and decision heuristics in HIV care

艾滋病毒护理中的疾病解释模型和决策启发法

• 批准号: 8018881
• 负责人: Michael BARTON LAWS
• 金额: $ 22.5万
• 依托单位: BROWN UNIVERSITY
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2011
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2011-08-09 至 2013-07-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/8018881
• 关键词: Adherence; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Behavior; Belief; Caring; Categories; Chronic; Chronic Disease; Clinical; Clinical assessments; Cognition; Cognitive; Communication; Comprehension; Conflict (Psychology); Confusion; Decision Making; Decision Modeling; Development; Diabetes Mellitus; Diet; Disease; Dose; Education; Educational Intervention; Effectiveness; Elements; Evaluation; Goals; HIV; Health; Human immunodeficiency virus test; Hypertension; Individual; Interview; Investigation; Knowledge; Laws; Lead; Learning; Life; Link; Medical; Mental Depression; Methods; Modeling; Nature; Outcome; Patients; Pattern; Persons; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Physicians; Process; Provider; Qualitative Methods; Qualitative Research; Questionnaire Designs; Questionnaires; Reading; Regimen; Research; Respondent; Safe Sex; Sampling; Scientist; Self Care; Self Care outcome; Structure; Taxonomy; Testing; Time; Translating; Viral Drug Resistance; Work; base; clinical care; design; evidence base; experience; health belief; health literacy; heuristics; improved; instrument; literacy; medication compliance; novel; patient oriented; response; social; theories; therapy adherence; tool

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Health literacy is commonly operationalized by tests of word pronunciation or reading comprehension. The causal connection between these abilities and health outcomes has yet to be elucidated. Research into the relationship between health literacy and outcomes in HIV care has produced conflicting results. We believe that resolving this confusion requires understanding the actual explanatory models of people living with HIV about HIV disease, ARV action, and other constructs relevant to treatment. We know little about how people with HIV choose to initiate or continue a medication regimen, or to take individual doses, along with other health-related behaviors. Until we fill this gap in our knowledge, we cannot design evidence-based educational strategies to give people with HIV the knowledge and understanding to support effective self-care and informed decision making. The long-term goal of this research is to apply new understanding and tools to the development and testing of educational interventions to support improved self-care and outcomes in HIV. The overall objective of this R21 is to understand the explanatory models of persons with HIV about the disease and its treatment, and in particular to identify models that conflict in potentially harmful ways with biomedical understanding. We also propose to develop and pilot test a novel HIV literacy assessment tool based on this broader concept of literacy. Future research will examine the predictive validity of the instrument for ART adherence and elements of physician-patient communication, and use it to develop educational tools to improve HIV-specific health literacy. Our central hypothesis is that individuals whose conceptual models accord more closely with biomedical understanding are more likely to act in accordance with medical advice. The rationale for the approach we propose is that a broadened evidence base is needed to expand the concept of health literacy to become more relevant to the clinical care of persons with chronic diseases. We have two Specific Aims: 1) Develop an in-depth understanding of common patterns of cognition about HIV and HIV treatment among people living with HIV. We will conduct in depth interviews with a diverse sample of 50 persons with HIV regarding their knowledge, beliefs, and conceptual models, and use a grounded theory approach to analyze the interviews to elucidate a taxonomy of cognitive models and heuristics for treatment decision making. 2) Based on the findings from Aim 1, we will design and cognitively test questionnaire items to assess respondents' HIV content literacy, and categories of explanatory models and decision heuristics, and preliminarily assess the relationship of response patterns to medication adherence with a diverse sample of 250 people living with HIV. This new understanding (Aim 1) can have tremendous impact because it uses rigorous qualitative methods to develop a patient-centered evidence base for HIV treatment education; while the assessment instrument (Aim 2) will translate the findings into a practical, clinical tool. Many of the lessons learned will be generalizable to other chronic conditions such as depression, diabetes, and hypertension. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: This proposed research will elucidate and categorize patients' explanatory models of illness in HIV care, their degree of concordance with biomedical understanding, and relationship to self-care behavior including anti- retroviral adherence. A structured assessment tool based on this new understanding will enable clinical assessment of patients' HIV-related knowledge, explanatory models, and treatment decision-making heuristics; and evaluation of educational interventions. This new understanding and methods will result in more effective support for medication adherence and other self-care behaviors in HIV and potentially other chronic illnesses.

描述（由申请人提供）：健康素养通常通过单词发音或阅读理解测试来实现。这些能力和健康结果之间的因果关系还有待阐明。对卫生知识普及与艾滋病毒护理结果之间关系的研究产生了相互矛盾的结果。我们认为，解决这一困惑需要理解艾滋病毒感染者对艾滋病毒疾病、抗逆转录病毒药物作用和其他与治疗相关的结构的实际解释模型。我们对艾滋病毒感染者如何选择开始或继续药物治疗方案，或服用个别剂量，以及其他与健康相关的行为知之甚少。在我们填补这一知识空白之前，我们无法设计出以证据为基础的教育策略，为艾滋病毒感染者提供知识和理解，以支持有效的自我保健和知情决策。这项研究的长期目标是将新的理解和工具应用于教育干预措施的开发和测试，以支持改善艾滋病毒的自我保健和结果。本R21的总体目标是了解艾滋病毒感染者对该疾病及其治疗的解释模式，特别是确定可能有害地与生物医学认识相冲突的模式。我们还建议基于这一更广泛的扫盲概念开发和试点测试一种新的艾滋病毒扫盲评估工具。未来的研究将检验该工具对抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性和医患沟通要素的预测有效性，并利用它来开发教育工具，以提高艾滋病毒特异性卫生素养。我们的中心假设是，那些概念模型更接近生物医学理解的个体，更有可能按照医学建议行事。我们提出的方法的基本原理是，需要扩大证据基础，以扩大健康素养的概念，使其与慢性病患者的临床护理更加相关。我们有两个具体目标：1)深入了解艾滋病毒感染者对艾滋病毒和艾滋病毒治疗的共同认知模式。我们将对50名艾滋病毒感染者进行深入访谈，了解他们的知识、信念和概念模型，并使用扎根理论的方法来分析访谈，以阐明认知模型的分类和治疗决策的启发式。2)基于Aim 1的结果，我们将设计和认知测试问卷项目来评估受访者的HIV内容素养，以及解释模型和决策启发式的类别，并初步评估250名不同样本的HIV感染者的反应模式与药物依从性的关系。这种新的理解（目标1）可以产生巨大的影响，因为它使用严格的定性方法来开发以患者为中心的艾滋病毒治疗教育证据基础；而评估工具（目标2）将把发现转化为实用的临床工具。许多经验教训可以推广到其他慢性疾病，如抑郁症、糖尿病和高血压。