Identification of Axon and Dendrite Regeneration Antagonists in Drosophila

果蝇轴突和树突再生拮抗剂的鉴定

• 批准号: 8594176
• 负责人: Katherine Louise Thompson-Peer
• 金额: $ 4.92万
• 依托单位: UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2013
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2013-09-01 至 2016-08-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/8594176
• 关键词: Affect; American; Animal Model; Axon; Calcium Oscillations; Cell Death; Cells; Characteristics; Clinical; Clinical Treatment; Cues; Dendrites; Development; Distal; Drosophila genus; Environment; Foundations; Genes; Genetic; Growth; Human; Image; Injury; Intervention; Kinetics; Lasers; Mammals; Methods; Natural regeneration; Nerve Regeneration; Nervous System Trauma; Nervous system structure; Neuraxis; Neurites; Neuroglia; Neuronal Injury; Neurons; PTEN gene; Paralysed; Pathway interactions; Pattern; Peripheral Nervous System; Play; Process; RNA Interference; Recovery; Regulation; Research; Rodent; Rodent Model; Role; Signal Pathway; Signal Transduction; Site; Solid; Specificity; Spinal Ganglia; Spinal cord injury; System; Testing; Tissues; Training; axon growth; axon regeneration; base; blocking factor; cell type; combinatorial; design; effective therapy; experience; fly; gene discovery; gene function; human FRAP1 protein; insight; mutant; novel; prevent; public health relevance; receptor expression; regenerative; research study; response; screening; transcription factor; two-photon

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Damage to the central nervous system is devastating and debilitating. There are no effective clinical treatments for serious central nervous system damage. Paralysis affects ~5.5 million Americans, according to a study in 2008 (Reeve Foundation, "One Degree of Separation"). Research into why neurons can't regrow across injury sites has yielded some insight. Yet the regeneration-preventing factors identified thus far only explain a small part of why there is no recovery. To develop effective therapies, we need a more comprehensive understanding of extrinsic and intrinsic regeneration antagonists. Our lab has recently developed a system that uses a two-photon laser to cut either the axon or dendrite projections of neurons in flies. After injury, we observe the degeneration of these projections and any subsequent regeneration. Regeneration in the dendritic arborization (da) neurons in flies shares a number of important characteristics with regeneration in mammalian systems, and allows unbiased discovery of genes that influence this process. I aim to use this system to ask fundamental questions about axonal and dendritic regeneration. (1) What are the intrinsic differences that allow some neurons to have the capacity to regenerate when other cells do not, even in the same permissive environment? Similar classes of well-described da neurons show distinct regenerative capacities. We know transcription factors that define the characteristics of these cell types, including the pattern of dendritic arborization, axonal targeting, and receptor expression. Do these transcription factors also define regenerative ability differences, and by what mechanism? (2) How do external cues from glial cells regulate whether axon regeneration occurs? Glial cells engulf neurite fragments during degeneration after damage. We will characterize the role of glia in regeneration, and examine glial signals that may regulate whether a substrate is permissive for axon growth. To what extent do signals inside the neuron and in the surrounding tissue combine to regulate regeneration? (3) What novel antagonists of regeneration can we identify and validate? After screening for novel regulators of regeneration, we will investigate whether identified antagonists are components of known or unique pathways. With answers to these questions, we will be able to better explain why neuron regeneration fails and more effectively design ways to treat injury. My graduate experience provides a solid foundation for examining the nervous system using genetics and imaging, and the experiments proposed here represent significant opportunities for personal training and discovery in a stimulating and supportive environment.

描述（由申请人提供）：对中枢神经系统的损害是毁灭性的，使人衰弱。对于严重的中枢神经系统损伤，目前尚无有效的临床治疗方法。根据2008年的一项研究（里夫基金会，“一度分离”），瘫痪影响了大约550万美国人。关于神经元为什么不能在损伤部位再生的研究已经产生了一些见解。然而，迄今为止发现的阻止再生的因素只能解释为什么没有复苏的一小部分。为了开发有效的治疗方法，我们需要更全面地了解外源性和内源性再生拮抗剂。 我们的实验室最近开发了一种系统，该系统使用双光子激光切割果蝇神经元的轴突或树突投射。损伤后，我们观察这些突起的退化和任何随后的再生。果蝇树突状神经元的再生与哺乳动物系统中的再生具有许多重要的特征，并且可以无偏地发现影响这一过程的基因。我的目标是使用这个系统来询问关于轴突和树突再生的基本问题。(1)是什么内在的差异使得某些神经元具有再生能力，而其他细胞却没有，即使在同样的宽松环境中？类似的类描述良好的da神经元显示出不同的再生能力。我们知道定义这些细胞类型特征的转录因子，包括树突状分支模式、轴突靶向和受体表达。这些转录因子是否也定义了再生能力的差异，通过什么机制？(2)神经胶质细胞的外部信号如何调节轴突再生的发生？神经胶质细胞在损伤后的退化过程中吞噬神经突碎片。我们将描述神经胶质细胞在再生中的作用，并检查神经胶质细胞信号，可能会调节是否基板是允许轴突生长。神经元内部和周围组织中的信号在多大程度上结合联合收割机来调节再生？(3)我们可以识别和验证哪些新的再生拮抗剂？在筛选新的再生调节剂后，我们将研究确定的拮抗剂是否是已知或独特途径的组成部分。有了这些问题的答案，我们将能够更好地解释为什么神经元再生失败，并更有效地设计治疗损伤的方法。我的研究生经历为使用遗传学和成像检查神经系统提供了坚实的基础，这里提出的实验代表了在刺激和支持环境中进行个人培训和发现的重要机会。